It was nice knowing Raspberry Pi while they lasted. Going to suck losing something that has changed the homegrown embedded system hobby forever.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    There’s tons of similar SBC’s out there from Chinese manufacturers, like Orange Pi, Banana Pi, etc; usually using mediatek RISC-V or rockchip ARM processors. They’re all poorly supported on the software and documentation side though and take more work to get going, which has always been where Raspberry shined- nobody else has made embedded computing so easily accessible with click and go OS options and continuous kernel maintenance.
    Probably the only board closest to software parity is the pine64 boards… but it’s still not quite as good.

    • YurkshireLad
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is the key point for alternatives. None seem to have the community and support (docs, s/w quality etc) that is remotely close to that of the Raspberry Pi.

      • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Guess the community for some of these is about to get much bigger. I’m not in the market for an SBC but this is a big negative against the Pi.

          • Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Why could you not run a modern OS after a couple of years? Those SBC manufacturers did not invent an entirely new processor architecture for their computers, you can just generically compile the kernel (plus maybe some slight device tree work).