• Cold Hotman@nrsk.no
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Depends on what the end goals are. If it is to generate tourism, of course.

    And what do you mean by “evil”?

    • d1tt0@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      My guess here is “evil” is the ecological impact of travel. High CO2 outputs from aircraft and prolonged automobile travel.

      The rebuttal is: take lower carbon impact travel options.

      IMO, traveling is inevitable and, maybe, necessary. There are few other ways to experience a culture and understand a people without it.

      • Sr Estegosaurio@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        My guess here is “evil” is the ecological impact of travel. High CO2 outputs from aircraft and prolonged automobile travel.

        But that’s a problem related to transportation in general. Not due to tourism. Aside from that we really need to switch out current ways of transportation to better, safer and clean ones.

          • Sr Estegosaurio@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I live in one of those countries. I can confirm. Also not having a diverse economy can be a a big trouble. Obviusly an economy purely based on tourism would suck. But that does not make tourism itself bad. Traveling is an enriching experience.

            Edit: fixed a typo.