• Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Also the IDF Hamas was fired upon when they raided in October. That makes this just war. Hamas Israel chose the war zone.

    Swap the word Hamas with israel every time you think there’s a great argument to post. Helps to avoid advocating for the murder of civilians like some crazy extremist.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      An extremist would say that this can’t end until one side kills the other, so might as well get it over with.

      I don’t believe that. I think as humans we have an obligation to try for peace without murdering half a million people. Unlike most people here, I want to believe that someday both sides can find a way to peace.

      But if you insist that one side is good and one side is bad, then this can’t end well.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I would argue that one side is fighting to achieve peace while the other side is fighting for the destruction of a population and the annexation of their land.

        Remind me again who is rejecting the ceasefire offers.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I would argue that one side is fighting to achieve peace

          Hilarious. Which side is that?

          (The second part I won’t argue. The inevitable annexation is deplorable.)

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            Hamas is has laid out a very clear and peace plan and has even agreed to a 2 state solution.

            Objectively looking at the situation one cannot say that there are two sides which do not want peace.

            Only one side does not want peace, and that is israel.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              6 months ago

              If Hamas hasn’t given up their hostages, they must not be that interested in peace.

              • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                6 months ago

                Israel said they will not stop the Genocide nor release the Palestinian hostages if Hamas releases their hostages. So not sure what you are talking about.

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’re also a racist that believes all Palestinians want to kill all Israelis.

        You state this openly, and then post a link to a study that doesn’t make that claim at all or anything resembling it and call it a source. Which, of course, isn’t how sources work. This is how sources work: https://lemmy.ml/post/15906506/11178832 The important bit there is that the source actually shows what I said it shows because I’m not a bad faith liar that enjoys justifying genocide.

        You’re already insisting one side is good and one side is bad when you intentionally, and surreptitiously lie to try and get people to think your racist statement is true, hoping they don’t actually click through to your so-called sources.

        So, please, pardon me if I don’t believe your bullshit pretending you want peace between the two sides.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            No, sources link by linking to the thing you say you’re linking to.

            In this example, I’m linking to your disgusting racist lie in your post that you also appended a source to that didn’t corroborate your racist lie.

            I’m going to be curious to see if you end up editing out the proof of your racism eventually in the future.