The reporter who broke the New York Post's bombshell story on the Hunter Biden laptop speaks out after the legacy media rejected the scandal during the 2020 election.
You keep asking why you should care, that question is irrelivent as your actions show you care deeply. I don’t know why you care so deeply were you just looking for a win in this argument?
It’s even simpler than that. Whatever Hunter Biden does is irrelevant to you, me, conservatives, Americans, the Presidency, and basically everything that isn’t Hunter Biden. The only exception is if Joe is implicated. But you haven’t shown any concrete evidence that this is the case.
Therefore it just seems like you just want to hate this guy, implying you’re the one who cares. Prove me wrong.
The only exception is if Joe is implicated. But you haven’t shown any concrete evidence that this is the case.
You keep making an argument against Joe being involved, from the start I’ve stated there’s no evidence he was involved. I don’t know how it’s so confusing for you to understand but here we are.
Therefore it just seems like you just want to hate this guy, implying you’re the one who cares. Prove me wrong.
I hate the guy by saying there’s no evidence he’s involved? That might be the dumbest thought to ooze out of your head.
I understand perfectly he is not involved, that’s my point. As a result, all you’re doing here is talking shit about random dude. I just don’t understand why that’s even worth your time.
I hate the guy by saying there’s no evidence he’s involved? That might be the dumbest thought to ooze out of your head.
Gaslight
Obstruct
Project <— You are Here
If you re-read that comment in context, you would see that I’m determining you care because you seem to hate the guy, therefore if anyone is upset here it’s you.
Didn’t expect you to understand either. All you can do is one of the three things above over and over with insults.
it just showed how little you understood my argument.
Your argument is that I’m obsessed with getting Joe based on a comment where I aknowledged there is no evidence of Joe’s involvement, and that is the only way I mentioned Joe.
Please show me the comment where I am out to get Joe.
You keep asking why you should care, that question is irrelivent as your actions show you care deeply. I don’t know why you care so deeply were you just looking for a win in this argument?
Gaslight
Obstruct <- You are Here
Project
It’s even simpler than that. Whatever Hunter Biden does is irrelevant to you, me, conservatives, Americans, the Presidency, and basically everything that isn’t Hunter Biden. The only exception is if Joe is implicated. But you haven’t shown any concrete evidence that this is the case.
Therefore it just seems like you just want to hate this guy, implying you’re the one who cares. Prove me wrong.
You keep making an argument against Joe being involved, from the start I’ve stated there’s no evidence he was involved. I don’t know how it’s so confusing for you to understand but here we are.
I hate the guy by saying there’s no evidence he’s involved? That might be the dumbest thought to ooze out of your head.
I understand perfectly he is not involved, that’s my point. As a result, all you’re doing here is talking shit about random dude. I just don’t understand why that’s even worth your time.
Gaslight
Obstruct
Project <— You are Here
If you re-read that comment in context, you would see that I’m determining you care because you seem to hate the guy, therefore if anyone is upset here it’s you.
Didn’t expect you to understand either. All you can do is one of the three things above over and over with insults.
Your proof that I hate the guy is ina comment where I said he wasn’t involved? I know logic is difficult for you but you can do better.
Lololol you’re really good at misunderstanding things people tell you.
Gaslight
Obstruct <— You are Here
Project
IG that’s why you like to insult others online, it makes you feel better about yourself.
The question mark at the end of a sentence is an indication that a question was asked. Was that too difficult of a question for you to answer?
It wasn’t a difficult question it just showed how little you understood my argument. I think it was just too difficult for you to comprehend.
Then you would have answered it.
Your argument is that I’m obsessed with getting Joe based on a comment where I aknowledged there is no evidence of Joe’s involvement, and that is the only way I mentioned Joe.
Please show me the comment where I am out to get Joe.