Lemmy.ca
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 11 months ago

NEW POLL: Nearly Half Believe Trump Should Drop Campaign Over Guilty Verdict

www.mediaite.com

external-link
message-square
61
link
fedilink
433
external-link

NEW POLL: Nearly Half Believe Trump Should Drop Campaign Over Guilty Verdict

www.mediaite.com

Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 11 months ago
message-square
61
link
fedilink
Half of voters believe Donald Trump should end his presidential campaign after his guilty verdict in his Manhattan hush money trial.
  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    163
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    And nearly half were never going to vote for him anyway. I want a poll of who was previously voting for him, and now will not.

    • KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      https://abcnews.go.com/538/trumps-guilty-verdict-impact-2024-presidential-election/story?id=110650906

      https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      11 months ago

      This one talks about it: https://youtu.be/uMVnhJEDQtg

      • cor@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        65
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        youtube videos are not polls

        • meco03211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Are you sure? I know someone on Facebook that seems to think YouTube videos are irrefutable evidence of pretty much whatever they claim.

          • cor@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            yeah, i saw this youtube video about how they’re very unreliable

        • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The like/dislike ratio used to be a poll of sorts.

          • cor@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            i stand by my prior statement

        • mildlyusedbrain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          He discusses actual polls you can look up? This isn’t a video just saying things it has data

          • cor@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            videos that mention data i could look up is exactly what i’m talking about…
            gimme the data, not some schmoo talking about how they misunderstand some data….
            there are infinite, strongly opinionated, youtube videos for every conclusion that inaccurately represents some sort of data….

            • mildlyusedbrain@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              By that logic any article from a news distributor is garbage. Which while true, you can find the original story from a new wire. Sourcing points is key but having someone write a table of authorities when they can link a video with their thoughts and data is fine

              • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Nope, if it’s a youtube video then it’s garbage on youtube that I’m not gonna watch. A link to a reputable news organization’s website says a hell of a lot more about its credibility, every time.

              • cor@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                apt username

        • takeda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          In the first minute of the video he talks about the pool done by Echelon Insights where they actually checked the exact same people.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.77K users / day
  • 7.76K users / week
  • 13.8K users / month
  • 28.8K users / 6 months
  • 514 local subscribers
  • 23.4K subscribers
  • 21.9K Posts
  • 601K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org