boem@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 29 days agoGoogle to push ahead with Chrome's ad-blocker extension overhaul in earnestwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1278arrow-down16
arrow-up1272arrow-down1external-linkGoogle to push ahead with Chrome's ad-blocker extension overhaul in earnestwww.theregister.comboem@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 29 days agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squarejennraeross@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·28 days agoI think Firefox will support both v2 and v3 extensions, so devs can use whichever makes more sense for their project. It has been a while since I looked into it though.
minus-squareRailcar8095@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·28 days agoFor the time being, yes, they will support both. But V2 will only work on Firefox (and forks) and I think brave, a very small percentage of users. So given that it will be like supporting two different extensions, I assume most extension developers will just switch to v3. How long after most extensions are v3 until Firefox drops/stops supporting is anybodies guess. It’s actually a great example of how chromes dominant position is screwing other browsers
I think Firefox will support both v2 and v3 extensions, so devs can use whichever makes more sense for their project. It has been a while since I looked into it though.
For the time being, yes, they will support both. But V2 will only work on Firefox (and forks) and I think brave, a very small percentage of users.
So given that it will be like supporting two different extensions, I assume most extension developers will just switch to v3.
How long after most extensions are v3 until Firefox drops/stops supporting is anybodies guess.
It’s actually a great example of how chromes dominant position is screwing other browsers