• ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Because their long term military strategy changed.

    Conscription makes perfect sense if you’re setting yourself up to fight a defensive war. E.g., Finland’s entire military is more or less built for a defensive war against Russia, so they conscript.

    Because they built it into their long term strategy, like I said in my original comment.

    Germany used to conscript, because there was this thing called the USSR that represented a very real and existential threat right next door. Then that stopped being the case, so their long term doctrine changed from defensive to expeditionary, so they stopped conscripting.

    Given that expeditionary wars in the middle east are becoming a bit faux pas, and “being invaded by your neighbour” is back in fashion, I imagine more places will shift doctrine again and conscription will start seeing a return. Then again it might not because of how fundamentally unpopular it is with the population.

    • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      And when there’s any chance of us having to fight a defensive land war against Russia, I will admit I was wrong.

      • ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Don’t worry, you don’t need to admit you were wrong for you to be wrong.

        Other countries considering a bad idea doesn’t make it a good idea.

        “Conscription is always a bad idea” is an objectively incorrect sentiment.