Coffeezilla asks: “Is the LAM a Scam? Down the rabbit hole we go.”

  • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you think that “pretty much everything AI is a scam”, then you’re either setting your expectations way too high, or you’re only looking at startups trying to get the attention of investors.

    There are plenty of AI models out there today that are open source and can be used for a number of purposes: Generating images (stable diffusion), transcribing audio (whisper), audio generation, object detection, upscaling, downscaling, etc.

    Part of the problem might be with how you define AI… It’s way more broad of a term than what I think you’re trying to convey.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think it’s becoming fair to label a lot of commercial AI “scams” at this point, considering the huge gulf between the hype and the end results.

      Open source projects are different due to their lack of commercialisation.

      • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Sure, but don’t let that feed into the sentiment that AI = scams. It’s way too broad of a term that covers a ton of different applications (that already work) to be used in that way.

        And there are plenty of popular commercial AI products out there that work as well, so trying to say that “pretty much everything that’s commercial AI is a scam” is also inaccurate.

        We have:
        Suno’s music generation
        NVidia’s upscaling
        Midjourney’s Image Generation
        OpenAI’s ChatGPT
        Etc.

        So instead of trying to tear down everything and anything “AI”, we should probably just point out that startups using a lot of buzzwords (like “AI”) should be treated with a healthy dose of skepticism, until they can prove their product in a live environment.

      • slurpinderpin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Machine translation has been used by large organizations for years. Anyone saying AI is a scam doesn’t realize it’s been around, and useful, for quite a while

        • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The issue is AI is just too broad of a term. It’s also not a magic bullet and comes with its own problems so it’s not even the best tool for the job many times.

          • slurpinderpin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It’s not too broad imo, there’s just a lot of different types. So saying “AI is a scam” is incorrect, because there are types of AI that are enterprise level, and are being used currently by all the largest companies in the world to save time and money - like Machine Translation

            So when I hear someone say it’s a scam, it just tells me they aren’t very familiar with AI, and only have experience with it in very limited forms and settings

      • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean, LLaMA is open-source and it’s made by Facebook for profit, there’s grey areas. Imo tho, any service that claims to be anything more than a fancy wrapper for OpenAI, Anthropic, etc. API calls is possibly a scam. Especially if they’re trying to sell you hardware, or the service costs more than like $10/month, LLM API calls are obscenely cheap. I use a local frontend as an AI assistant that works by making API calls through a service called openrouter (basically a unified service that makes API calls to all the major cloud LLM providers for you). I put like $5 in it 3 or 4 months ago and it still hasn’t run out.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I find there’s 4 kinds of folks talking about AI.

      There’s folks who think it’s as amazing as all the tech firms tell us:

      1. And we’re all gonna die

      Or

      1. And life will be amazing

      Then there’s folks who think AI is hype whack bananas

      1. And think it’s a scam.

      And lastly,

      1. The folks who see that we’ve already changed life as we know it with AI. That there’s still massive potential, but folks in categories 1 and 2(, and 3,) are all kinda nuts.

      4 gang.

      • dsemy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        There’s a 5th type - those of us who understand that the technology itself isn’t a scam and has valid uses (even if many “AI” startups actually are scams), but think there isn’t that much potential left with current methods due to the extreme amount of data and energy required (which seems to be supported by some research lately, but only time will tell).

        • foggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s in line with type 4. I guess it needs subtypes like 1 and 2 or whatever.

          I agree with your view there, but also believe that it won’t take much to get from where we are to where we begin to have novel solutions/approaches to things like quantum computation, superconductors, cold fusion, nuclear fusion, et al.

          Should that happen, I would disagree. Until some other stronghold gives way, I agree.

          Quantum computers seem most plausible.

      • Hackworth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m in whatever subset of 4 believes advancements in AI are necessary almost to the point of being an ethical obligation at this point. Transhuman or bust.