• iiGxC@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    But I would prefer, if I had a fatal disease, to be told “we don’t know how to cure this because we can’t test a cure without torturing animals” than for there to be a cure at the cost of all those innocent animals being tortured.

    • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The thing is, new chemical compounds are being developed all the time for all kinds of applications. What you’re saying is not really “we should let sick people die rather that try to get a cure”, horrible enough as it is, but rather “let’s dump whatever shit we come up in the environment without testing its effect first”, and while things are bad currently, there is no depth to how worse things could get if we didn’t even bother trying to prevent the worst from happening

    • Turun@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’d be surprised how many diseases were fatal once. Aside from fixing broken bones or something like that, drinking tea, suffering and praying it will get better are your only options for the vast majority of diseases if you truly want to live with a clear mind.

      • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’m not saying discard all present knowledge. I’m saying stop testing on animals and find other ways to test treatments going forwards

        • Turun@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Fair enough. It would put a stop on developing new medicine for a while (5-20 years maybe?), but I can understand the opinion that “what’s done is done, we just should not continue doing that”.