• Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    It must be the AI accounts that take offence with the licence.

    That would be my guess.

    There’s a lot of history in the last three-ish weeks in multiple of my posts with me using the license, including a standalone topic, where people/““people”” are ripping into me every way they can for using it, so I’m assuming it’s just more of that.

    The same cycle tends to reoccur approximately every day to every other day. Usually someone asking an innocent question about it, and then somebody else replies to them, ripping into me, and then it explodes from there, derailing the OP.

    I hate that the Lemmy admins are not taking care of the problem (if you admins are, and I’m just not just seeing it, then you have my apologies, and my thanks), but I’m also kind of numb to it at this point.

    Getting to the topic of the OP…

    Gamers Nexus is very consumer advocacy oriented, so I hate to think people are downvoting them for being them.

    In fact, if you’re looking to build a PC, and want good advice on your rights when it comes with warranty repair for products you may have purchased, I would definitely suggest watching the video that’s linked In this topic (start @26:00 if you are in a hurry).

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

    • BeigeAgenda
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Remember I’m pullin’ for ya–we’re all in this together. ✊🏼

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        7 months ago

        Remember I’m pullin’ for ya–we’re all in this together. ✊🏼

        Thanks, and no disrespect meant, but I would believe that more if you did license your own comments as well.

        In case you need the formatting for it, here it is…

        [~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en)

        Feel free to replace the link to point to whatever license you wish to use for your own content, if you do not want to use the same one that I am using.

        Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I don’t think the license does anything at all, but it is weird to me that you are not also including some unique phrase or UUID. How are you going to prove their models used specifically your copyrighted content in the event that courts rule it is not fair use to do so? If you had a unique phrase you could probably trigger the model into repeating it as evidence.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I don’t think the license does anything at all

            ProPublica would disagree with you.

            you are not also including some unique phrase or UUID

            The specific license number is explicitly stated.

            How are you going to prove their models used specifically your copyrighted content in the event that courts rule it is not fair use to do so?

            Already discussed in that other conversation post.

            Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              You are writing “anti-commercial AI,” they are making their work explicitly available to republish non-commercially. You have completely different motivations. One major difference between you and ProPublica is they must have interacted with some actual lawyers explaining how copyright works.

              • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                7 months ago

                You are writing “anti-commercial AI,” they are making their work explicitly available to republish non-commercially.

                That’s just a description of what the license actually does, non-commercial usage of my content.

                It’s actually not even my description, it’s one I got from someone else, who’s also licensing their content with the same license.

                I have no problem with my content being used for non-commercial purposes.

                You have completely different motivations.

                No, I do not. My intent aligns with ProPublica.

                Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

                • barsquid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  “Your license doesn’t do what you say it does.”

                  “Haha, joke’s on you, I don’t want it to do what I say it does.”

                  Glad we figured that one out.