• psvrh
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    6 months ago

    What does Jeff’s yacht cost? Half a billion? And he paid to widen a canal to dock it?

    We do not tax these people anywhere near enough.

      • psvrh
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        60
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        In the before times, when corporate and marginal income tax rates were high and stock buybacks were illegal, a business could do two things with its profit:

        • Reinvest it into the business, as employee compensation, equipment or facilities, and/or
        • Pay taxes.

        In the 1980s, we gave them a third option:

        • Keep the money

        …which for some reason was supposed to not encourage the rich to hoard money and/or engage in non-productive financialization.

        The rich, of course, hoarded and engaged in financial engineering pretty much immediately, and everyone else, which meant employees, suffered for it.

        Think about how stupid of an idea this is: giving the rich the ability to hoard money and then against all reason, somehow expecting that they won’t do the thing you’re incentivizing them to do. Even George Bush called it “voodoo economics”.

        If you look at wages-vs-productivity curves you can see society “break” in the 1980s, with the rich running away with their wealth and everyone else getting stuck in a quagmire of low wages and starved public services.

        So that’s why high progressive taxation helps employee: it forces the rich to either invest in their businesses or fund the nation.

          • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            6 months ago

            You’re right, getting money out of politics is necessary for correct decisions to be made by the government.

            • DessertStorms@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Or one can aim to abolish the entire system instead of applying band aids to the cancer that it is and and pin all of your hopes on them sticking (not even fixing anything, just… sticking)…

  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    Y’know what would fix this? Broad wave of hands a comp-an-y stooore! Amazon should just provide them housing. Since they would be living in corporate housing and that isn’t free, we could get them to pay rent! Oh and they would also need food to eat, so we can have our store provide that for them. Food isnt free though…

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSObRNcPAv8

  • Beaver
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Time to boycott the company.

      • Pavidus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        Totally understand your point. They will never lose enough customers to actually feel it.

        That being said, I’m doing my part.

      • Beaver
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m doing it right now.

      • bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I wish I could avoid aws, but learning how to use a new cloud host is expensive and time consuming. And the other choices aren’t that much better

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Meanwhile, local businesses in towns everywhere struggle to hire employees because Amazon pays better. Messed up.