return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 8 months agoForcing workers back to the office could be terrible for the environmentwww.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1388arrow-down115cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1373arrow-down1external-linkForcing workers back to the office could be terrible for the environmentwww.motherjones.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square62fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareZaktor@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoYeah, but the CEO personally profits from RTO, while the company profits from reducing their office footprint. Easy choice. He’s not loyal to the company and neither should @[email protected] be.
minus-squareBuddahriffic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoIf the company is publically traded, shareholders could sue over that conflict of interest.
Yeah, but the CEO personally profits from RTO, while the company profits from reducing their office footprint. Easy choice. He’s not loyal to the company and neither should @[email protected] be.
If the company is publically traded, shareholders could sue over that conflict of interest.