• Throwaway@lemm.eeM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Dreamers are illegal immigrants who were abused by their parents. This does not mean we shouldnt deport them.

      • Throwaway@lemm.eeM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Deportion is not abuse, why on Earth would it be?

        I think we have fundementally different ideas of what abuse and deportation are

        • ImplyingImplications
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Deportion is not abuse

          The recipients of DACA are young people who have grown up as Americans, identify themselves as Americans, and many speak only English and have no memory of or connection with the country where they were born.

          You would send someone to a country they have no memory of, no connection to, and cannot speak the language and not call it abuse? They’re not being sent home. They’re effectively being sent to a foreign country.

          • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Exactly. That’s why it’s abusive. It’d be like sending a random conservative to Hungary. Though CPAC attendees may love Hungary, I doubt they’d like to be sent there forcefully when they identify as an American through and through.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s not an apt comparison.

              It is not sending a random person to a random country.

              It is sending a citizen of that country back to their country.

              One can agree or disagree with doing it, but it isn’t a random person being sent to a random country.

              If we want to get particular, it is the right thing to do under international law.

              • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                It is sending a citizen of that country back to their country.

                When you say “their” country, what do you mean?

                • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  The country of their origin and citizenship. You don’t identify as an American; you ARE an American.

                  They were not born here, and their parents were not citizens. They are not citizens of American.

                  If they are deported, they are being sent back to their rightful country. The one that can issue them a passport.

                  • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    The only reason I’m a citizen of American is because of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution:

                    Section 1.

                    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

                    That is, the law of the U.S. defines my status as a citizen of the U.S. by virtue of my being born here.

                    Still, there are four other ways to become a citizen of the U.S.

                    • by naturalization
                    • by marriage
                    • through parents
                    • through the military

                    These pathways are all outlined in various laws.

                    Again, the status of immigrants who are now citizens is determined by law.

                    I said earlier that “the ‘We support a legal path to citizenship for immigrants that go through the proper channels’ people do not, in fact, support a legal path to citizenship for them”. That is, Republicans generally refused to grant citizenship to immigrants by passing the DREAM Act. In their inability to govern, they did not pass a law.

                    You make it seem as if citizenship is an inherent characteristic of being born in the U.S. It is not. Repeal the 14th Amendment, and birthright citizenship goes away. Change the immigration laws, and lesser or greater numbers of immigrants can be granted citizenship. You’re right, “They are not citizens of America.” But they could have been (and could be) at the stroke of pen. It is the law that determines citizenship. While I’m both an American citizen and identify as American, dreamers only identify as American. It’s only because of xenophobia that dreamers are not citizens.