Mayelín Rodríguez Prado was arrested after uploading images to Facebook of a small demonstration in Nuevitas in August 2022

At the age of 22, Mayelín Rodríguez Prado received the heaviest of the sentences the Cuban government handed down to a group of 13 people who demonstrated in August 2022 in the municipality of Nuevitas, in central Cuba. Prado, who is the mother of a little girl, will serve 15 years in prison for publishing the protests through the social network Facebook.

Prado recorded the moment in which Cuban police beat three girls during the demonstration, as well as other repressive actions against protestors. The young woman, whose daughter at the time was less than a year old, was detained at her home after the protest and held in solitary confinement at a State Security facility.

The judicial sentence issued by the Municipal Court of Camagüey, to which the Cuban Observatory for Human Rights (OCDH) had access, states that the court agreed to punish Prado as “author of an intentional and consummated crime of enemy propaganda of a continuous nature” and “author of an intentional and consummated crime of sedition.” The court also announced sentences of between four and 14 years for 12 other participants in the demonstration for the same crimes. According to the Cuban Penal Code, sedition is a “crime against the internal security of the State,” and anyone who “tumultuously and by means of express or tacit agreement, using violence, disturbs the socialist order” can be prosecuted on that charge.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wondering how they can tie this to American sanctions like they do with every other issue Cuba has.

    • ILikeBoobies
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      So I will take a stab at it

      Sanctions aren’t relevant here to the outcome though you could relate them to the need for protest which still wouldn’t justify the outcome. It would let you side with the protesters for being the power of the people and exemplifying Juche

      however the US’ track record with both Cuba and the governments of other American countries does reasonably lead to paranoia

      Also worth noting Cuba is a dictatorship not communist

      • draneceusrex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Agreed, but to your last point, it is also worth noting that there are different economic models under authoritarian regimes. Both Nazi Germany and the USSR were dictatorships. Is it Marixist Communism in Cuba? No. But it is recognizable as a communist state as was perpetuated by the Soviet Union historically, regardless if you feel the term has been misappropriated.

          • draneceusrex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            One person being able to kill and erase from the country’s history books anyone under him, but is unable to micromanage every detail for a country with millions of people and is still forced to delegate tasks, does not make a dictatorship. Got it CIA. Thanks for the details of the semantics of the situation of these authoritarian regimes.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Whether a country is socialist becomes a quantum superposition when arguing with tankies. Condemning the country’s actions? How dare you, that’s good socialism there. Criticizing socialism based on that country? How dare you, that’s not really socialism.

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Like this.

      “Every possible means should be undertaken to promptly weaken the economic life of Cuba,” Lester D. Mallory, then the deputy assistant secretary of state for Western Hemisphere affairs, said in April 1960, arguing that U.S. policy should aim “to bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government.”

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        That wrong doesn’t excuse someone being locked up for the “crime” of taking pictures of police brutality.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Right. But it does tie it to the American sanctions like every other issue Cuba has.

          • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            Ah, because of the root of the protest? I guess so, although Castro wasn’t exactly tolerant of political opponents prior to the sanctions.