• M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I will never understand the appeal for cloud based home automation.

    All the spying aside, 16 years and your thermostat is no longer supported sounds ok until you think about how if you replace everything with cloud based equivalents you are always going to be having to replace things going out of service. I think its funny that you pay more for a device that lasts for lot less (How many thermostats have people seen fail?). I guess the companies are happy?

    • shinratdr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The appeal is remote and centralized management, easier programming and more features. If that’s not worth it to you to replace your thermostat every 16 years, then nobody is forcing you to get one.

      But being able to change the temp from my phone from anywhere is worth it to me, as well as including it with other automations for all my connected devices. The appeal is honestly not hard to see, even if it’s not worth it for you personally.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        You know (I hope) that that functionality does not require a cloud based service right? You are describing features for things I was playing around with 20 years ago, what you need is a program or app, not a live service. The appeal of controlling your things from your phone is not new.

        • shinratdr
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          No it doesn’t require it but it can make it easier. Especially for people that don’t have a robust and centralized way of controlling their smart devices, or only have 1-2 of them. I think the appeal is still obvious.