• ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    61
    ·
    7 months ago

    This isn’t fascism. These people will get a slap on the wrist and be sent home in a day or two. Under fascism these people would never be heard from again.

    • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      So punishing free speech and protest is not fascist provided that they are “only” in jail for a couple of days? Seriously?

      Obviously cracking down on protests doesn’t mean it’s 1930s Germany but it’s part of the same playbook, surely?

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m certainly not defending the silencing of protest. It’s just that all fascism is authoritarian, but not all authoritarianism is fascist. Fascism has a specific definition and it’s a whole other degree of bad.

        • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Fair enough. It is being used more colloquially in this case, you’re right. I retract the accusation of fascism and substitute “an unjust authoritarian crackdown on the right to freedom of speech and expression, undermining the very tenets of democratic society. A national embarrassment.”

        • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          would you be able to link to a page that helps describe fascism as you say: that relies on severity of consequence?

          asking because whilst i agree that fascism is specific - and this doesn’t cover it - im not sure that degree of severity is part of the definition and that could be a dangerous precedent to set because the other parts of fascism about control and quashing dissent enable the severe consequences once they are present

            • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              really appreciate you taking the effort! i see where you’re coming from with the “enemies of the state” part, and think that id agree there

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is fascism-lite. Just because people aren’t disappeared doesn’t mean it’s not in the same category. And the only way we can hope to stop from getting to “actual” fascism is by resisting shit like this.

      • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Exactly.

        Fascism doesn’t come in detended stages, it’s tiny increments where the state seizes more power and restricts rights gradually until suddenly you notice that people are disappearing and everyones primary emotion is fear

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t disagree that silencing protest is bad. It’s just not fascism. Fascists kill dissenters.

        Treating protestors like this is the norm (though it always must be fought). It’s how they were treated during Occupy Wall Street. It’s how they were treated during Vietnam and the civil rights fight. Authoritarianism can come from both the left and the right. Fascism is always from the right.

        • rammer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Fascists kill dissenters.

          Not in the beginning. In the beginning it’s more about the economic side of fascism. And that has definitely happened in the US. For decades now.