The show’s good btw…

  • ☭ Parabola ☭ @lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    Capitalist realism. Human society has always been able to solve its problems. The issue is capitalism — our current society — can’t solve the problems it created like massive wars, hunger, regular economic crisis, and global warming.

    Capitalism hasn’t existed forever, and it won’t exist in the future. Our civilization will solve the problem of capitalism by seeing to its abolition.

    • antidote101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Capitalism hasn’t existed forever, it literally started in the late 1700s during a period called The Industrial revolution, when factory machining started the first cottage industries that pushed out previous modes of hand crafting.

      At that point, when machines and cottages to hold them started to be required for mass production and hence competition in the market (pushing out hand crafting as a competitor) CAPITAL became a requirement of mass wealth accumulation… because one needed large sums of Capital to buy the machinery, rent the building, and hire and train the workers to exploit. So it became the limited province of the already well off to do.

      That’s when Capitalism was born, and why it’s named CAPITAL-ism. Because it has Capital requirements if you want to join the Capitalist class. It was created in the British Industrial Revolution.

      That you’re unaware of this change in the mode of production and what it represents, and believe that "oh Capital has just existed forever" is what some Marxists refer to as being in a state of “false consciousness”.

      The system wasn’t always this way, and doesn’t have to necessarily be this way (eg. Marx offered the model of workers owning the machinery or “means of production” as his alternative, and there are likely others). Capitalism is a product of a technological “change of epoch” of the “mode of production.”

      …and it’s defined the age we live in, and how we think. Which is what the later Frankfurt School neo-marxists discuss.

      P.S. It’s also worth noting that the British Industrial Revolution, The French Revolution, and the American Revolution all overlap in time periods. Live was very different before the late 1700s.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Are you referring to some pre-capitalism economic systems?

      Like Feudalism? Greco-Roman slave-based economies? Tribal subsistence economies? Mesopotamian barter-based economies? Ancient Indian caste-based economies?

      Seriously, which system are you pointing to that holds answers? I’m not against your position, I just can’t imagine what you mean.

      • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Capitalistic Socialism seems the most successful offshoot of Capitalism. Pure Capitalism is killing its social networks, and the fabric of that system’s societies is falling apart.

        • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          It was just the statement that “human society has always been able to solve it’s problems” followed by a condemnation of capitalism. So I assumed there was some prior system that worked better for solving problems.

          I guess they say Mussolini made the trains run on time. And Egypt’s slave economy was stable for thousands of years.

          It’s like I said, I can’t see a prior example that is not meaner and uglier than capitalism, or at least as mean and ugly.

          Capitalistic Socialism may indeed be a better path for the future. But I didn’t think it could be the original poster’s intent.

          • billgamesh@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            apparently “egypts slave economy” is largely debunked. they had slaves like every other stone age culture, but their economy (and pyramid building) relied largely on paid labor

              • billgamesh@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                For the records, saying that capitalism is temporary does not imply OP desires reverting to a previously existing economic system either, so the egypt thing was a non-sequitor anyways

      • The_Sasswagon@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’d diagnose the problem similarly to the person you replied to and I don’t think I’d feel compelled to offer a specific remedy either.

        People have been experimenting with economies and societies for thousands of years and we are in a relatively new money/power/control stuck spot right now. I’m sure there’s been a system in history that would work much better than what we’ve got, but I just read recreationally so I dunno what it is and just because something worked 1000 years ago in North America doesn’t mean it’ll work here today. I wouldn’t mind giving something new a shot though, what we have is not working for most people.