• Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    The American “safety net” is an invalid term.

    Other countries have safety nets.

    The states have optional temporary emergency measures that don’t fully support basic needs.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      What I love is how many of them have work requirements now. It’s not a safety net if it doesn’t help you when you can’t get a job.

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        And those work requirements usually stop benefits once you make a certain income, often putting you below where you were when you were solely on benefits.

        Meaning it’s an uphill battle just to stay afloat… I’m mixing metaphors here, but you know I mean.

        The system is built to determine who deserves benefits, not who needs them.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The joys of “rugged individualism” and tugging on them bootstraps. We really need to reevaluate this whole social contract business.

        • girlfreddy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          The only “free” money allowed goes to corporations and banks, who mismanage themselves and the stock market, thereby causing rich people to feel uncomfortable.