• BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    US government does not have a public fund or tax to pay for the development of a government sanctioned Unix/GNU operating system by a US company. Once that happens, then this issue goes away.

      • corsicanguppy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Well, it was. It’s not the reliable, stable OS it was only a few years ago. It has really pushed the envelope for stupid since its first foray into Dumb for EL6.

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Yeah. This irks me even more because the US Gov:

          A. Has laws that could have prevented IBM from buying RedHat.

          B. Knows it relies on RedHat for securing critical systems.

          C. Didn’t do shit about the purchase.

          Ideally, each government would look out for the public’s interest, in these things. But in this case, it failed to even look out for it’s own interests (which would have aligned, in this case).

          • Veraxus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            US Government: “Anti-trust? Pfft, keep that bribery lobbying train coming and we will absolutely trust you.”

            The Public: That’s not what “trust” means… oh…

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      In reality it is more complex. However, I know the air force uses a ton of Linux and related tools such as Kubernetes and Samba. Who would’ve thought a fighter jet would be running kubernetes