Edit - This is a post to the meta group of Blåhaj Lemmy. It is not intended for the entire lemmyverse. If you are not on Blåhaj Lemmy and plan on dropping in to offer your opinion on how we are doing things in a way you don’t agree with, your post will be removed.

==

A user on our instance reported a post on lemmynsfw as CSAM. Upon seeing the post, I looked at the community it was part of, and immediately purged all traces of that community from our instance.

I approached the admins of lemmynsfw and they assured me that the models with content in the community were all verified as being over 18. The fact that the community is explicitly focused on making the models appear as if they’re not 18 was fine with them. The fact that both myself and one a member of this instance assumed it was CSAM, was fine with them. I was in fact told that I was body shaming.

I’m sorry for the lack of warning, but a community skirting the line trying to look like CSAM isn’t a line I’m willing to walk. I have defederated lemmynsfw and won’t be reinstating it whilst that community is active.

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    What even was the community, I dont see any focused on CSAM, or appearing as it. Was it small breasts?

        • ass_destroyer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly without anyone citing the actual post in question it’s literally impossible for any of us to make up our own minds on the content. All we have is one admin’s word vs another. I haven’t personally seen anything even approaching CSAM-adjacent anywhere on lemmynsfw, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. At the same time it does kinda seem like the blahaj admins wanted to defederate anyway and finally found a convenient scapegoat – it seems odd that one would completely defederate an entire instance over a single post. So I really have no idea what to think.

          • ‘Leigh 🏳️‍⚧️@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Honestly without anyone citing the actual post in question it’s literally impossible for any of us to make up our own minds on the content. All we have is one admin’s word vs another.

            Sure, but this isn’t a poll. This is an admin decision that has been made. I appreciate knowing that she made it and why. And if the material looks like CSAM to her — even if it’s actually not — then of course she wouldn’t (and shouldn’t) point anyone to it.

            At the same time it does kinda seem like the blahaj admins wanted to defederate anyway and finally found a convenient scapegoat

            She doesn’t need a scapegoat, she’s the Blahaj Zone admin. If she’d wanted to defederate with them before today, nothing was stopping her. To the contrary, a request had already been made for this action about a month ago and Ada said “I haven’t seen any reports coming through for content from that instance, which makes it hard to choose to defederate, because I haven’t seen any examples of the problems you describe to get a sense of how the admins are responding.”

            it seems odd that one would completely defederate an entire instance over a single post.

            Except she didn’t. She defederated because of the LemmyNSFW admins’ response (or lack thereof) to the problematic content they were federating outward and thus got copied onto a storage device that Ada is responsible for. She clearly doesn’t need the ethical nor the potential legal headaches.

            People act like defederation is some horrible thing, but really, it’s one of the things that makes the Fediverse so good. Centralized platforms have executives that have to answer to the entire user base plus advertisers, and everyone is stuck with their decisions. On Lemmy, instance admins make the best decisions for the community they want to build, and any user who doesn’t like it can set up a secondary account or fully migrate to another instance that fits their needs better without losing access to their social network.

          • blazera@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            dont need the post itself, it’s accusations on a whole community. Unless this isn’t the community

      • Moc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Jesus. CSAM-adjacent material needs to be nuked indiscriminately.

    • PartyPooper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Looked through my block list on Liftoff, and they had/have? a community called fauxbait. I’ve blocked probably about 5 communities from there for having the same vibe.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        That community is thoroughly creepy. It apparently wasn’t the one that triggered defederation, but still… Bad vibes from that name and such