ickplant@lemmy.world to Data is Beautiful@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoLowest-taxed group in each state of the United Stateslemmy.worldimagemessage-square172fedilinkarrow-up1803arrow-down118file-text
arrow-up1785arrow-down1imageLowest-taxed group in each state of the United Stateslemmy.worldickplant@lemmy.world to Data is Beautiful@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square172fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBeaverlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up60arrow-down2·7 months agoThis is hard to look at! Tax the rich!
minus-squareRailing5132@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down3·7 months agoAnd then eat them.
minus-squareiAvicenna@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·7 months agoand then tax them again for good measure
minus-squarenikaaa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoI never understood what that means. Cannibalism is not good for your health.
minus-squareridethisbike@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 months agoQuiet, you! Down the hatch!
minus-squareGabu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 months agoNo, cannibalism isn’t good for their health.
minus-squareYawweee877h444@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agoWe could make dog and cat food out of them.
minus-squarePanda (he/him)@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months ago“Cannibalism is not good for your health” 🤓☝️
minus-squareAux@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down10·7 months agoThe rich don’t have income, they are not represented here at all.
minus-squareSirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·7 months agoTax their wealth then 🤷🏻♂️
minus-squareiAvicenna@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·7 months agoor you know, their charities would be quite sufficient
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·7 months ago The rich don’t have income They certainly have revenue.
minus-squareAux@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down7·7 months agoAnd it’s taxed differently and not present on these graphs.
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·7 months ago And it’s taxed differently More “taxed not at all”.
minus-squareAux@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·7 months agoWell, that’s a different problem.
This is hard to look at!
Tax the rich!
And then eat them.
and then tax them again for good measure
I never understood what that means. Cannibalism is not good for your health.
Quiet, you!
Down the hatch!
No, cannibalism isn’t good for their health.
We could make dog and cat food out of them.
“Cannibalism is not good for your health”
🤓☝️
The rich don’t have income, they are not represented here at all.
Tax their wealth then 🤷🏻♂️
or you know, their charities would be quite sufficient
They certainly have revenue.
And it’s taxed differently and not present on these graphs.
More “taxed not at all”.
Well, that’s a different problem.