• TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    Liberals and conservatives are different in ways that matter A LOT to liberals and conservatives. The differences don’t matter nearly as much to leftists, which pisses off liberals to no end.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Does it matter to them? There’s a whole demographic of morons that act like the differences aren’t clear as day. That a “left leaning” person would even consider voting R in 2024 is a horrific joke.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Some leftists view the US as the last of the old empires, built on violent conquest, genocide, exploitation, and stolen land. They would say that the world cannot progress so long as the United States exists, and they might vote R precisely because they think if R is in power it will accelerate the collapse of the US empire.

        • dmMeYourNudes@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t see any significant number of people doing this. That would be like demolishing a condemned building while you’re standing in it. Yeah it probably should come down, but there are still people inside.

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          This might be true, but it’s a little tangential: leftists just don’t have a horse in the race. From a dialectical materialist perspective, neither party/candidate is substantially different. They are also quite aware and are resentful of the electoral strategies of the R/D divide that manufactures crisis around social disagreements instead of addressing the increasingly distressed working class conditions. They are well aware of the ‘threats’ posed by the R side, but they regard them as intentionally overblown and even somewhat encouraged by the D’s who are increasingly desperate not to address materialist issues for fear of loosing the support of capital.

          Basically: they think the desperation of the democratic party is a bit of schadenfreude for enabling the R party and the orange cheto man to begin with, and they think the D’s need to feel a bit of electoral pain in order to come around on issues that are more central to leftist concerns.

          • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Any leftist that doesn’t have a horse in the race is a fool and probably a queerphobe to boot.

            Genocide against trans people is not a “social disagreement” and anyone who says otherwise is a bigot.

            • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I hate to break this to you but the assault against trans people has already been happening and the Biden administration dgaf about it

              https://www.pbs.org/video/over-400-anti-lgbtq-bills-proposed-2023-b14bsw/

              This is such a weird hill to die on as a biden supporter because he’s quite famously catholic and has repeatedly flip-flopped on civil rights -gay marriage, integration, police reform, and abortion being prime examples. If libs never press the issue with him he will simply never do anything about it.

              • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                I think it’s incredibly telling that your own source doesn’t support your argument.

                Setting that aside, your argument is terrible because even if Biden doesn’t care about trans people, I’d prefer that to someone who hates them. This both-sides argument is dogshit.

                Edit: when I replied, I missed the video and thought it was an incredibly short article. I’m not watching a long video.

                • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Edit: when I replied, I missed the video and thought it was an incredibly short article. I’m not watching a long video.

                  Well then do me a favor and hold your tongue next time you get the urge to accuse someone of being a bigot or a queerphobe, because you clearly don’t give a fuck yourself.

                  • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    There’s no point to going through the effort of watching it because your argument fails to address the issue, as I said. Even then, it’s extremely discourteous to expect me to go through a long video to find the timestamps you didn’t provide. After all, there’s a decent chance that you’re simply doing this to waste my time. If you provide quotes and timestamps I can verify that would be good supporting evidence. But again, the evidence must support a viable argument or else it’s pointless.

          • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            This might be true, but it’s a little tangential

            It probably is, and what you describe is probably more representative of what most leftists think about liberal/conservative politics, but I don’t think that matters much to liberals. I don’t think liberals care whether you are an R voting accelorationist leftist or a leftist who doesn’t engage out of indifference. The liberals see both actions as essentially helping the Republicans, which is an unthinkable crime, in their minds. It’s just two different groups with two different ideologies; ideologies that each group believes are mutually exclusive.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              which is an unthinkable crime, in their minds

              Is that even up for debate? Republicans want to genocide trans people. Why is it even a question about who to support.

              • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Just a stupid thing: You could have been using that word like that on purpose for effect, which is fine, but just in case; They want to annihilate trans people, possibly eugenicize trans people, but you can’t commit genocide on trans people cause it’s not an ethnic group or nation.

                Sorry, I had to get that out of my system or I wouldn’t be able to sleep.

            • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yea, no argument there. I just think people accuse leftists as being ‘accelerationist’ as a way to paint them as ‘just as bad’ as republicans, or worse-than since they acknowledge the damage being done but are actively rooting for it instead of being indifferent or in denial as a republican voter might be.

              There are certainly leftists that fit that description, but I think it’s just a convenient way for some to dismiss them as crazies.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Some leftists view the US as the last of the old empires, built on violent conquest, genocide, exploitation, and stolen land. They would say that the world cannot progress so long as the United States exists, and they might vote R precisely because they think if R is in power it will accelerate the collapse of the US empire. are the dumbest fuckers you will ever meet.

          Ftfy