• 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like this story is essentially propaganda at this point- at least in the USA where the ‘risk’ for the rich never plays out.

    The rich don’t actually risk their money. They risk the government’s money and other’s lives and livelihoods. When they fail, they get bailed. Bailed out by the banks. Or they simply don’t pay their bills and lay off all their employees and let everyone else take a bath.

    Rather than inflating everything, why don’t we tax the shit out of their held wealth? Seems more direct without all the side effects of making FOOD, HOUSING, AND HEALTHCARE UNAFFORDABLE

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There isn’t anything wrong with the mechanic of inflation as a means to encourage money to be reinvested into the economy.

      You’re right about cost of living not keeping up with wages. You’re right about fucked up taxes on the ultra wealthy. You’re right about a massive erosion of social services. you’re right that the USA healthcare system is fucked up.

      These are all issues that are distinct from the plan of maintaining a moderate (2%) inflation rate.

      Yes, we SHOULD get living wages, unions and legislation should do that. The top tax bracket SHOULD be taxed at 70% that’s tax policy. We SHOULD reinvest in social services that’s government poicy. You SHOULD get universal healthcare, that’s a government program. Inflation isn’t the thing keeping you from any of these things.