• MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The evidence I have provided is circumstantial, not causal, I admit that, but it’s certainly better than no evidence at all.

    Meanwhile, you’re not providing ANY evidence whatsoever, all you’re doing is reminding me of something I already know and have already admitted.

    To put it in simpler terms, what we have is a crime scene and someone’s footprints leading towards and away from it. Does that mean that person did it? No, because we’re missing a murder weapon with their fingerprints on it as well. But I’d say it certainly merits further investigation. Meanwhile, you’re just burying your head in the sand because you’re friends with the suspect and don’t want to see them in jail, but you can’t give them an alibi and you don’t have any proof of their innocence.

    • nova_ad_vitum
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      To put it in simpler terms, what we have is a crime scene and someone’s footprints leading towards and away from it. Does that mean that person did it?

      Literally nothing like this exists in the scenario you’re referring to which is why you have to resort to absurd analogies. You seem incapable of making a rational justification for your assertion.