Archive link

Microsoft’s Windows and foreign database programs also sidelined as Beijing favours Chinese hardware and software

Among the 18 approved processors were chips from Huawei and state-backed group Phytium. Both are on Washington’s export blacklist. Chinese processor makers are using a mixture of chip architectures including Intel’s x86, Arm and homegrown ones, while operating systems are derived from open-source Linux software.

  • 7heo@lemmy.ml
    201·
    9 months ago

    Substantially. CISC vs RISC is night and day. Keeping x86 for so long was a mistake, but one that generated billions in value for shareholders.

    • someguy3English
      2·
      9 months ago

      If I can ask, if we go way back like 40 or 50 years ago, why did cisc get adopted over risc?

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
        12·
        9 months ago

        Cisc was never adopted. It all started out basic, then they gradually added more and more shit until you had a complex CPU.

        Without the concept of risc there wouldn’t be a cisc.

      • 7heo@lemmy.ml
        7·
        9 months ago

        Additionally to the other answer: the reason CISC came up to be was “less instructions”. Memory was a lot more expensive, and developers worked in assembly a lot more. So, less instructions made a lot of sense. Now, memory is cheap, and developers almost never write assembly unassisted.