How does this KEEP GETTING WORSE??

  • skulblaka@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Hey I made some fan art of a marvel character, should marvel pay me?

    When they use that fan art in the next official marvel movie, yes absolutely they should.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      46
      ·
      9 months ago

      But it’s their character, you didn’t ask permission to make the art out of a copyright, why should they pay you?

      • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s their character, but it’s your work.

        They cant just steal your work for their own monetary gain, just the same as you cant steal their character for your own monetary gain.

        Both sides have contributed something here, but one side is profiting off the other through theft.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          But the rub is, under fair use you can’t profit from it though, so as soon as you accept payment, now they can sue you. So in the end, they win and get it for free regardless.

          • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            If the rights holders enter into a contract and pay you for your work, I don’t think they can turn around and sue you for making a profit off of it. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t think the law is that far gone.

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              But how can they make a contract? Signing it would violate fair use exemption before that could be argued.

              Corps are abusing a conflict within the laws, it’s not even a loophole, it’s just the unfortunate way the laws that protect each person/industry don’t agree.

              • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                There’s nothing conflicting about this.

                They have a right to the IP, you have a right to your works.

                They can make a contract with you to use your works in their IP.

                • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  They can make a contract with you to use your works in their IP.

                  No, that violates the fair use act, and is the entire point, you can’t commercialize and profit from other people’s work. A contract would literally mean you’ve commercialized it, and have violated the fair use act…. It can’t happen, it’s literally why corps are doing this, and getting away with it.

                  It sucks, argue that it shouldn’t be that way, but it’s reality, sorry.

                  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    No, that violates the fair use act

                    Negative.

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use

                    Thus, fair use need not even be raised as a defense unless the plaintiff first shows (or the defendant concedes) a prima facie case of copyright infringement.

                    and

                    However, binding agreements such as contracts or licence[sic] agreements may take precedence over fair use rights.

                    You can enter into a contract. There is no requirement that the original work is unpaid. Quite the opposite. If the original IP owner purchases it, since they own the IP there’s no case of copyright infringement. And nothing stops the work creator from entering into contracts.

                    Edit: I’m not arguing this. This is literally the ONLY way to get paid for fair use materials. Period. You’re wrong. Fair use is an anti-copyright lawsuit claim. There is no issue of copyright if you sell to the original copyright owners.

                    And even then… EVEN IF you were correct. Your claim that they cannot sell it to the original IP holders doesn’t just allow them to steal the work. That’s still theft.

              • FireTower@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                Contracting someone to use an artwork they made of your character would implicitly grant a license for them to make commercial profit off of that transaction.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Profit is not explicitly one of the four factors of fair use.

      • BlemboTheThird
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 months ago

        They’re still taking something they didn’t make and selling it as though they did. I have every right to write and film a Batman movie, spend as much time I want making it professional, and then show it to people, as long as I don’t charge them for it. That doesn’t give Fox or whoever the right to take my movie and charge for it instead. Even if I did break the law by making people pay for it, the actual owners would only be entitled to that money, not to go make mroe money off of it themselves. It’s still my work even if it uses concepts invented by someone else.

        There’s a reason every franchise under the sun has mountains of fanart and fanfic without the companies that own them trying to take control of it: it’s blatantly illegal.