Removed by mod

And? The textile industry predates electronics by a LONG time. It’s not just a “spool rack” if that came after…

Are you suggesting that electronics came before textiles…?

Pretty sure this one predates yours by a couple centuries.

A lot of stories can be in compilations, or originally in magazines or other form of combined methods.

Also, large print? Too many factors to just pick a book up and know its length.

Well knowing if it’s a short story, novella, novel, novelette, or other form of narrative is always helpful.

Edit spelling

For what’s it’s worth, a warmed up vehicle will usually be warm and melt fresh snow. But if there’s an inch of snow, it’s just gonna melt the bottom into ice and restick to the hood. Snow is a fantastic insulator, so it doesn’t take much for it to protect the rest.

Engine hoods have an insulation layer in a fire blanket.

Unless you’re running your vehicle for an hour or longer without moving, it’s not melting snow. And when moving, it’s being cooled too fast to melt.

Brush the snow off, you’re supposed to anyways!

If it wasn’t sexual material, they would have had no reason to change it…

Your entire defence and reasoning falls flat before it starts. If the material wasn’t offending, they wouldn’t have had to change it. Other stores allowed it AFTER changing… so what did they do to piss valve off? That’s a different discussion though. That I’m not getting into.

And yes, what they described is sexual, I’m sorry to inform you that your societal norms aren’t correct.

I was proven wrong, so I’m going to be a child.

Yeah that tracks, I guess if you’re a child yourself it’s not pedo material… but that doesn’t change the moral of the story.

You don’t ever have a need to use child sexual material to make a point. This is the part you’ve never addressed, and why yours defending pedo by not addressing it. You are saying it’s okay, it never is, and there’s no justification. Which you’re doing here, very badly I might add.

1. The content they described was not sexual content. The entire point of the game is to be unnerving by having a set up where you are transparently treating humans the same way and as if they were horses. You can screech all day that it’s a “fetish farm”, but that really says more about you than it does about the game.

That’s the build that you’re playing…. Not the one that had the offended content. I already explained this…

1. We don’t even know what the offending content was. Steam hasn’t publicly said and the scenario we’re discussing (where a girl and parent treated a horse man exactly like a horse would be treated in real life, which is NOT sexual no matter how much you want it to be) is the supposed best guess of the developer.

Absolutely false. This is the playing dumb part.

The studio stated that Steam provided an automated response following an initial review that the game would not be distributed as it, in Valve’s words, “appears, in our judgment, to depict sexual conduct involving a minor”

Stop defending pedo material.

There’s being cautious, then there’s wrapping yourself in bubble wrap. You are implying and saying here that you should unplug a battery charger before removing the dewalt battery.

Those cautions are for the laymen’s that don’t know better, or would spill alcohol in the room and then remove the battery. Yes there is SPECIFIC cases where it’s dangerous, not all cases. You’re using them backwards. Which also, unplugging the charger would be the spark that caused the ignition ironically in that situation…

Just labeled, if you decided to read my comments instead of just espousing about a different build of the game isn’t pedo sexualism.

The prebuild of the game had that content, if you’re JUST viewing what’s in the game now, you’re willing ignorant of context. Yes they changed it, does that mean they should be allowed to re-submit the game after fixing the issues? Well that depends on how you address them. Which they did by being shady, and saying valve didn’t tell them. There’s plenty of sources saying that it was the pedo parts.

Being able to release the fixed game is its own issue, which can only be addressed with the context of the early build THAT HAD THE OFFENDING CONTENT.

If you need to use child sexual material to make a point, find another way, which they clearly did after getting slapped. 1% or 100% makes no difference, and we know the whole game isn’t fetish for pedos, it was one scene. But they also had to adjust the other characters ages, so the rest wouldn’t get caught up in the same thing after getting caught once.

And labeled as pedo defender. These posts make it to easy.

Riding a horse naked in a fetish setting is still sexual. The human is irrelevant. Can’t ignore other context because you want your underage material. The cast was underage before, and then they changed it and are acting dumb. They are trying to hide stuff, you don’t need to do that if it wasn’t sexual or underage.

It’s hilarious this needs to be explained in detail to people.

A child being brought to a fetish farm and participating isnt sexual? They say it isn’t sexual, but it is, and if you need to clarify everyone isn’t underage… yeah they were.

I hope you aren’t defending pedos here.

The article ignores that they made child sexual material and are playing dumb, which is why it was banned.

Doesn’t domestic include siblings? Domestic just means family/house.

You’re the one talking like your way is the only right way.

Someone was providing some knowledge about how to save their saves.

You…. Uhh… don’t need to solder it back on. Conductive tape, this also makes it simpler for next time, since it’ll happen again.

And a piece of cardboard levels out the work area. These are all non-issues you are making into mole hills and then mountains.