• vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Hell some of those remarks are better than the original IMO the True Grit remake is infinitely better than the original one, mind you I dont like John Wayne movies and this aint even me being political I fucken love Clint Eastwood movies.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      The Battlestar Galactica reboot kicked ass where the original was legit campy and crappy. Reboots can be okay, but for one: stop rebooting a great and successful franchise, you already are up against a very high bar.

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        💯 the new Dune movies could be considered a reboot, but they’re light years better than the 80s movie, which was widely considered a disappointment by fans of the books and a financial failure.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m seeing a resurgence of people liking the '80s version, but it’s mostly because of the camp, but also because it’s more accurate to the book, until the end. The miniseries is honestly possibly the best version, though most people don’t know it exists. The new one is by far the most interesting, and it sounds and looks nearly perfect.

          • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            The 80s movie is absolutely not more accurate to the book. Duncan Idaho gets shot with a gun, the Fremen had sonic blasters made from ‘killing words’, the Harkonnen had heart plugs, the ornithopters didn’t even have wings. I could go on and on, it went way off text.

            The latest movies are much closer to the books, the few changes make total sense for the format of cinema, they don’t radically change the tone or mechanics of the setting.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              It follows the events better I guess is what I should say. The new one cuts a lot more of it out and adds a lot more that wasn’t there. The tone of the old one is totally wrong and the new one is more accurate.

              That said, neither are perfect. All of the adaptations make a lot of changes

    • Lesrid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it’s funny you use Clint Eastwood to prove you’re not politically motivated because he talked to a chair to entertain conservatives while John Wayne on the other hand was a Nazi. Like I get it, you can absolutely disagree with both it’s just funny the difference in egregiousness.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        I like old Clint Eastwood movies in spite of my politics, my dislike of John Wayne movies is further amplified by my politics and the fact he was just an awful person overall. Seriously Waynes death was fucken poetry, getting cancer because he wanted to be Genghis Khan and promptly getting irradiated is fucken poetic.

        But yeah both Wayne and Eastwood are/were bastards, If memory serves me right they both said some pretty egregious shit about Sacheen Littlefeather at the 45th academy awards.