(Turning Point: The Bomb and the Cold War) is an exhaustive, immensely ambitious nine-part, ten-hour series that covers the Cold War from before the beginning (the Russian Revolution) to after the end (the Russian invasion of Ukraine). Or did it ever end? As national-security journalist Garrett Graff puts it in the series, “If you open the newspaper on any given day, we’re still living with the aftermath of the Cold War.” The original Cold War may have wrapped up with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the rise of Perestroika, but it has revived as Russian President Vladimir Putin resuscitated the country’s aggressive nationalist spirit when he was elected Russian president on the last day of 1999.

However you define the Cold War’s parameters, Turning Point is a mighty feat of historical documentary storytelling. (T)he series combines the veracity and thoroughness of a Frontline installment with the style (and, by all appearances, the budget) of a major documentary release.

  • girlfreddyOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’m about 1/2 way through this and it’s an amazing history lesson, chock full of stuff even this 60+ yr old woman had never heard before.

    If you’re at all interested in knowing how we all got here, now, this is the show for you.

    Netflix hit this one out of the park.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Glasnost and Gorbachev was a thing. So I’d say Putin definitely has reversed a lot of progress.

  • Certified Asshole@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    I would suggest you to additionally learn how much frequent terracts added to his potency as an ex-director of russian CIA and as a president. Once he took power, houses started to blow up, and at one such case policemen discovered a bag of hexogene in the basement of one of Ryazan’s region houses later called ‘Ryazanski sugar’. It was later shoved off as an excersise for special forces, yet many still think that they know who ordered to blow these houses up. And with coming years I have less doubt they are correct in their suspicions.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In the wake of Oppenheimer’s inevitable Oscar coronation Sunday night, a celebration of a movie about the tormented father of the atomic bomb and the world he helped create, the mega-streamer has dropped Turning Point: The Bomb and the Cold War, which includes an extensive account of the events leading up to the Manhattan Project, the atomic testing at Los Alamos, the annihilation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the arms race that defined the second half of the Twentieth Century.

    Directed by Brian Knappenberger, who also helmed Netflix’s Turning Point: 9/11 and the War on Terror, the series combines the veracity and thoroughness of a Frontline installment with the style (and, by all appearances, the budget) of a major documentary release.

    Perhaps most importantly, it makes clear that the possibility of nuclear war is still very much alive, especially with Putin taking every opportunity of late to remind the world that he’ll deploy nukes if and when he damn well feels like it.

    Here in one place are detailed accounts of the murderous rise of Stalin; the execution of the Rosenbergs; the scourge of McCarthyism; the gallows humor of Dr. Strangelove (which Ellsberg, feeling his oats as he approached his death, cheekily deems “a documentary”); the Bay of Pigs and Cuban Missile Crisis (remember, kids, duck and cover); and the creation of the CIA, which sponsored bloody coups in Iran and Guatemala, among other places, using the mere possibility of Communist expansion as justification.

    Turning Point makes abundantly clear that both super powers did plenty of dirty Cold War deeds, and that none of them were dirt cheap, as a glance at the American nuclear bill will attest.

    The series deftly illustrates that Putin’s contempt for democracy, and his compulsion to vault Russia into a ruthless new golden age, crush dissent, and stay in power indefinitely, follows a pattern that has more in common with Stalin than, say, Brezhnev.


    The original article contains 725 words, the summary contains 319 words. Saved 56%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • ladicius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Western colonialism has never ended, and Russian colonialism only took a dip around perestroika but never ceded completely. China got into the game in the 90s or 2000s, too, and here we are. Humankind never stops exploiting and killing each other and the rest of the biosphere so war in general never ends.

    At least until the expanding sun sterilises earth, of course.