If you are incapable of dealing in factual evidence but prefer belief in the narrative, please don’t watch this video. It will upset you. Better to disregard the provable facts presented in a video and live in fantasy land because the thought of finally realizing that they have been lying to you would crush you.

  • Emmy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s funny that he could quote that and yet not read other quotes like

    that there are “several material distinctions” between the two cases, and the allegations against Mr. Trump “present serious aggravating facts” not present in Mr. Biden’s situation.

    And

    the evidence was insufficient to charge President Biden with a crime

    Doesn’t sound like Jordan proved anything.

    • Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      Are you going to tell us what the “aggravating facts” were? Did you not watch the video when the report was read. That biden was guilty but too old and too confused about the facts. That no jury would convict him because he is basically incompetent mentally at this point

      • Emmy@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Don’t need to. I’m just proving the opposite of what Jordan did. With the same report. It’s called cherry picking and the reason why you should read the report or ignore Jordan altogether.