I mean, people use dash-cams protect themselves in case of a car crash, so do you think people in the future would also use body-cams protect themselves in case of being involved in a fight?

  • Tordoc@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel the more likely scenario is for public surveillance to reach a point where everyone outside their home (or near a window) is being recorded from multiple sources.

    • user_Blue@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s already the case in neighborhoods and apartment/townhome complexes, Amazon’s Ring. Can’t walk down the street without being recorded on both sides by at least 50% of front doors / driveways. Amazon who was recently caught allowing employees to view hundreds of women’s home camera feeds (even indoor cameras, since the average person doesn’t fully consider how much a single company can spy on you when there’s a camera/microphone reporting directly to their servers).

      • Tordoc@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Very true, I forgot about the doorbell cameras! Neighbors on FB will often post their camera footage when a “suspicious” (read: black or young) person drives by

        • user_Blue@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sooner or later, it’ll be borderline impossible to talk a stroll without being captured on a video somewhere. I wonder how disguises/masks might evolve to counteract. And if any scene occurs, you’d better bet there’ll be at least one phone camera pointed at it.

          • eezeebee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Look up “Justice Caps” and “Hacker Hoodie”. Infrared anti-camera apparel

      • user_Blue@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I await the day whenever secure, self-hosted services are the norm instead of centralized, proprietary services.

        • cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Humans are lazy. Having someone else set up all the details is a lot easier than doing it yourself. Until we fundamentally change the human condition, it will be a losing battle. The best we can likely do is limit the damage and reduce the difficulty of taking the better road.

          • user_Blue@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            What if there happened to be an extremely determined individual who’s dream is to change “the human condition?” Sure it will be a losing battle in the beginning, but a battle fought doesn’t determine a war. Especially if it’s a war that’s been waged over our entire history. The market would also have to shift towards simple to deploy, self-hosted, free (as in freedom) open-source devices. Once everyone understands why a little effort can go a very long way, then I’m sure we can all actually change for better; for our future.

            • cynar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              For seasoned self hosters, it’s a little effort. For novices it’s more work. For the initiated, it’s a huge effort, for no apparent gain.

              We are fighting the Nash equilibrium, and I can’t see how we can adjust it in favour of self host etc. It’s better to fight the battles we can win, than pour effort after the impossible. In this case, it’s to provide an independent option that is as low effort as possible. This can become a reference to keep the excesses of the big companies limited, to some degree.

              • Valmond@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Today it might be as much a hassle as to assemble a micro computer in the eighties, but I bet it will be one as easy as filming with your mobile phone in the future.

                • cynar@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Question for you, what percentage of people now build their own computers? It’s far less than it used to be.

                  • Valmond@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The point was that in the future it will be easy to set up surveillance cameras

        • harmonea@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Secure, self-hosted services take knowledge to set up. Everyone wants a plug-and-play solution.

          • user_Blue@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            What if, over time, we focused on plug-and-play, free (freedom), open-source solutions? Take framework laptops as an example. There was a problem with laptops being difficult to self-service, so they developed a solution. Sure, not THE solution, but progress in the right direction means a lot. As long as we can recognize the faults in centralized services. (Spread relatable awareness), and care enough to support action which further develops decentralization.