Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoYEEETslrpnk.netimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1554arrow-down18
arrow-up1546arrow-down1imageYEEETslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squareHonoraryMancunian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29·9 months agoThis meme has a ‘haha, wouldn’t that be funny’ quality to it, but for real though, is it a possibility?
minus-squareEvil_Shrubbery@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up38·edit-29 months agoNah, you can tell from the bones what kind of muscles were (& how they were) attached to it.
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·edit-29 months agoThe silhouette wouldn’t change as much as in that image, it would probably be more like the image in this article: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/was-spinosaurus-a-bison-backed-dinosaur-12849430/ If you look at the silhouette of the bison vs it’s bones the muscle still doesn’t extend that far above the bones, but has more volume around the bones.
This meme has a ‘haha, wouldn’t that be funny’ quality to it, but for real though, is it a possibility?
Nah, you can tell from the bones what kind of muscles were (& how they were) attached to it.
The silhouette wouldn’t change as much as in that image, it would probably be more like the image in this article: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/was-spinosaurus-a-bison-backed-dinosaur-12849430/
If you look at the silhouette of the bison vs it’s bones the muscle still doesn’t extend that far above the bones, but has more volume around the bones.