smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square155fedilinkarrow-up1862arrow-down110cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1852arrow-down1external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comsmileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square155fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·10 months agoIt’s usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine.
minus-squarezarenki@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·10 months agoThe passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features.
It’s usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine.
The passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features.