• Steeve
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well if you think ‘because they say so’ is reason enough there’s not really any further to go here I don’t think. I was hoping you’d have a more interesting answer about how the economy is structured or how resources are distributed. It looks more like an authoritarian flavour of capitalism to me but I’m no politics expert so I only have a layman’s view, more than happy to be corrected.

        • Steeve
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • mr_pichon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They have private companies and a market economy, how is that a communist economy exactly ?

            If your only argument for saying they’re communist is because they said so, then you must also believe that north korea is a democracy right ?

            • HeavenAndHell@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re correct. China, I believe I heard, also has more billionaires per capita than the US. Don’t quote me on that, I’m not entirely sure.

      • masquenox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What makes me think that two countries that have never identified as capitalist

        The DPRK “identifies” as “democratic” - so by your logic you should just swallow that hook, line and sinker, too, eh?

        have never been identified as capitalist anywhere except

        Oh, boy… are you in for a surprise - Lenin himself dubbed the fledgling USSR as “state capitalist”.

        Nothing new about it, Clyde.

        Every one of your arguments have been blown out of the water with next-to zero effort… and yet you still pretend you’re in the game.