• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    It is perfectly tolerant to reject intolerance. In fact it is a hopeless endeavor to tolerate the intolerant.

    It’d also really help your argument if you didn’t use antivaxxers as an example.

    • uzi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      Does it help you cope in the world by condemning someone with a different view? If someone says “I am against vaccines” they might agree, “Yes, I am anti-vax” and say it’s an accurate description, you’re not insulting them.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yea, it does. Whether due to fears from misinformation, intentioned rejection of the social good, or just to troll - whatever the cause antivaxxers massively eroded public health and discourse. There’s no shades of grey here - antivaxxers were simply wrong.

        Now, some of the individuals were swept up in the misinformation and thought they acted in an ethical manner - those are folks who I hope grow as individuals and become better people… but the grifters - those who spread that misinformation for money, fame or political influence - those people can get fucked.

        • uzi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          You still have to handle the people around you everyday who have never receieved an injection. You have stop living my emotions and opinions and actively seek out verified information that goes against what you believe in and see if you can provide your own counter information to disprove it. If you can’t be friends with someone without knowing if they got injected, you are in a cult of invinsible ignorance.