The progressive vote is hardly guaranteed. It’s fickle, hyper critical, divided, which enervates us as a voting bloc. Conservatives are the most reliable voters, and, surprise surprise, they wield outsized political power.
Oh really? So what do you think all that pandering to “centrists” makes them? After republicans have pushed so far to the right and with democrats following after them for so long, insisting that “we must work with republicans” (while republicans are free to obstruct and undermine), republican-lite is an accurate description.
This shows you don’t understand the US political system at all. The US system is intentionally designed to require compromise. The US also has extremely weak party discipline. Voting against your own party is unheard of in most parliamentary systems, but it’s normal in the US. That means there needs to be compromise even within a single party. If you want progressive policies, more progressive Dems need to be voted in.
There are people like you on the Republican side too. People who would rather the government shut down than compromise with Democrats.
Edit: if you seriously think a president Bernie Sanders wouldn’t also compromise with Republicans, then you don’t know the first thing about how legislation is passed.
You mean like when the republicans compromised with the democrats on the supreme court where Obama picked basically a conservative judge (Merrick Garland) as a compromise and the republicans didn’t hold a hearing for him anyway? Yeah, the republicans were soooo punished for pulling that stunt with a majority batshit insane conservative court. You don’t understand the US political system at all because you’re taking democrats with their talk of “decorum” and “compromise” at face value. Democrats compromise with republicans but will not compromise with progressives. Democrats will try to primary progressive candidates and we all know how they treated Bernie during his two presidential bids.
Bernie would probably compromise with republicans because he isn’t as fervent as republicans. I wish we had a progressive that fights as fiercely and as dirty as the tea party republicans. When you’re in a mud wrestling match, you can’t be afraid to get down and dirty. However, Bernie would be far more likely to push for progressive policies.
No. This is extremely lacking in nuance. I am not defending all compromise. Some compromises are garbage. But being against any compromise, and praising the Tea Party, is a lazy ignorant position. Obama was an overrated moderate president, unlike Biden who has tried very hard to pass progressive policies.
Even with a Republican president and senate, House Democrats somehow managed to pass some of the most generous and progressive Covid relief in the world (even more than Scandinavian countries), including expanding child benefits and Medicare, and the US is benefiting from the strongest economic recovery in the world because of it. Biden has eliminated $130 billion worth of student loans. The Inflation Reduction Act was the biggest environmental legislation in a generation, and recommits the US to the Paris agreement. You know who voted for all these good compromises? Bernie Sanders.
Calling that “Republican-lite” is straight up ignorant. Republicans wouldn’t do any of that.
I wasn’t praising the tea party, I was saying I wish democrats would fight as hard and dirty because obviously that approach worked. It’s funny that you think Biden is some step above Obama when it was Obama who joined the Paris agreement in the first place (plus did the Iran deal, which Biden refuses to rejoin, even though the US broke the deal). The covid benefits were generous under republicans too, but it doesn’t matter since most of that shit was revoked and was a fraction of the money handed over to corporations. Yay, we caught some drips from the trillions of dollars printed.
The economic recovery is on paper, but there are severe vulnerabilities underneath. The US is standing tall because the other countries are simply doing worse. It helps a lot that the US dollar dominates global markets. I wouldn’t want to hitch the economy onto the president so much because for one, the president has little to do with the economy, and second, if the economy happens to crash between now and the election, Biden’s chances of re-election are toast.
Causing a problem and then making minor chips at it is not a good thing. The “biggest environmental legislation in a generation” sounds great until you realize how little has actually been done about it. Also, it’s huge in terms of money spent, but the benefits remain to be seen since the important point is where that money goes. Handing private companies tons of money doesn’t necessarily translate to great results (it does result in great bonuses for execs, though).
I reward them with my guaranteed vote, which happens to be guaranteed because the alternative is worse.
The progressive vote is hardly guaranteed. It’s fickle, hyper critical, divided, which enervates us as a voting bloc. Conservatives are the most reliable voters, and, surprise surprise, they wield outsized political power.
The progressive vote would be guaranteed if democrats would push progressive policies in earnest instead of constantly trying to be republican-lite.
Exhibit A. That is exactly what they are not doing. Anyone who thinks they are Republican lite is not paying attention.
Oh really? So what do you think all that pandering to “centrists” makes them? After republicans have pushed so far to the right and with democrats following after them for so long, insisting that “we must work with republicans” (while republicans are free to obstruct and undermine), republican-lite is an accurate description.
This shows you don’t understand the US political system at all. The US system is intentionally designed to require compromise. The US also has extremely weak party discipline. Voting against your own party is unheard of in most parliamentary systems, but it’s normal in the US. That means there needs to be compromise even within a single party. If you want progressive policies, more progressive Dems need to be voted in.
There are people like you on the Republican side too. People who would rather the government shut down than compromise with Democrats.
Edit: if you seriously think a president Bernie Sanders wouldn’t also compromise with Republicans, then you don’t know the first thing about how legislation is passed.
You mean like when the republicans compromised with the democrats on the supreme court where Obama picked basically a conservative judge (Merrick Garland) as a compromise and the republicans didn’t hold a hearing for him anyway? Yeah, the republicans were soooo punished for pulling that stunt with a majority batshit insane conservative court. You don’t understand the US political system at all because you’re taking democrats with their talk of “decorum” and “compromise” at face value. Democrats compromise with republicans but will not compromise with progressives. Democrats will try to primary progressive candidates and we all know how they treated Bernie during his two presidential bids.
Bernie would probably compromise with republicans because he isn’t as fervent as republicans. I wish we had a progressive that fights as fiercely and as dirty as the tea party republicans. When you’re in a mud wrestling match, you can’t be afraid to get down and dirty. However, Bernie would be far more likely to push for progressive policies.
No. This is extremely lacking in nuance. I am not defending all compromise. Some compromises are garbage. But being against any compromise, and praising the Tea Party, is a lazy ignorant position. Obama was an overrated moderate president, unlike Biden who has tried very hard to pass progressive policies.
Even with a Republican president and senate, House Democrats somehow managed to pass some of the most generous and progressive Covid relief in the world (even more than Scandinavian countries), including expanding child benefits and Medicare, and the US is benefiting from the strongest economic recovery in the world because of it. Biden has eliminated $130 billion worth of student loans. The Inflation Reduction Act was the biggest environmental legislation in a generation, and recommits the US to the Paris agreement. You know who voted for all these good compromises? Bernie Sanders.
Calling that “Republican-lite” is straight up ignorant. Republicans wouldn’t do any of that.
I wasn’t praising the tea party, I was saying I wish democrats would fight as hard and dirty because obviously that approach worked. It’s funny that you think Biden is some step above Obama when it was Obama who joined the Paris agreement in the first place (plus did the Iran deal, which Biden refuses to rejoin, even though the US broke the deal). The covid benefits were generous under republicans too, but it doesn’t matter since most of that shit was revoked and was a fraction of the money handed over to corporations. Yay, we caught some drips from the trillions of dollars printed.
The economic recovery is on paper, but there are severe vulnerabilities underneath. The US is standing tall because the other countries are simply doing worse. It helps a lot that the US dollar dominates global markets. I wouldn’t want to hitch the economy onto the president so much because for one, the president has little to do with the economy, and second, if the economy happens to crash between now and the election, Biden’s chances of re-election are toast.
Biden eliminated $130 worth of student loans after helping create the $1.7 trillion student loan crisis we have now: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/dec/02/joe-biden-student-loan-debt-2005-act-2020
Causing a problem and then making minor chips at it is not a good thing. The “biggest environmental legislation in a generation” sounds great until you realize how little has actually been done about it. Also, it’s huge in terms of money spent, but the benefits remain to be seen since the important point is where that money goes. Handing private companies tons of money doesn’t necessarily translate to great results (it does result in great bonuses for execs, though).