I think I’ve settled on the latter. Disagreement is maybe best communicated by the absence of an upvote? And downvotes work best when they signal something that is just off base, and while not reportable, is not appreciated at a broad cultural level.

  • socsa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    You are ignoring how trolls operate in reality though. THey explicitly use “just having an opinion” as cover for shitting up a forum. Look up “sealioning.”

    But again, this is my opinion. People are far too concerned about the downvote button. And the fact that the above, completely respectful but seemingly controversial opinion already has downvotes kind of proves my point.

    • positiveWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be useful if people actually used it to burrow trolls, sealions and irrelevant comments as intended, but as I’ve seen people can’t be trusted with that because as you say: It becomes a “disagree” instead, that targets everything that people disagree with. It gets inane on political topics where useless comments for the right tribe gets immensely upvoted. “Covfefe” Yes, very informative. There could be alternate vote for agreement, funny, or troll mark.

      • sweetviolentblush [they/them]@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There could be alternate vote for agreement, funny, or troll mark.

        Yeah I like this, definitely a troll button next to the vote buttons would be really useful for users to self-moderate comments