Depending on the particular cannon, in some of them the supervision is active at all times. That his senses just let him see all the layers and through all the layers.
So it’s not just that he CAN see all of them all the time. He doesn’t even have a choice. It would mean nudity to any degree was extremely unremarkable to the man.
That argument doesn’t make sense to me. If you were used to seeing people’s bones your whole life, then bones would be part of your model of an attractive woman.
Depending on the particular cannon, in some of them the supervision is active at all times. That his senses just let him see all the layers and through all the layers.
So it’s not just that he CAN see all of them all the time. He doesn’t even have a choice. It would mean nudity to any degree was extremely unremarkable to the man.
also i’m not gonna be aroused in seeing someone naked if i can see that same person without skin or muscle at the same time
That argument doesn’t make sense to me. If you were used to seeing people’s bones your whole life, then bones would be part of your model of an attractive woman.
“Nice femurs”
And you could see deformities and cancer way early.
Sounds like a disastrous life
This argument breaks down as soon as you consider that we see clothed people all the time and yet some of them are still attractive.