• bitwolf@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    For some of us, 6.3in screen with 100% screen to body ratio is still too large.

    At 100% Id want 5.0in.
    In today’s phone standards 4.5-4.8in seems reasonable.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      So not a phone from 10 years ago, one from earlier.

      Similar in size to a Nokia 3310 from 2000? H: 113, W: 48 therefore diagonal size is 123mm or 4.8/4.9 inches.

      To me it seems like there’d be a severe usability penalty there, but if that’s what you want.

      • bitwolf@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I was thinking the traditional 16:10 form factor. Essentially, a touch screen phone narrow enought that you could hold without the “pinky shelf” grip.
        But also short enough that you can reach all four corners of the screen without adjusting your grip.

        The iPod touches achieved this with their form factor.

        There was an experimental phone some time between Android 2.3 and 4.4 that had it’s entire UI designed around the thumbs mobility.
        It was drowned out under Android and iOS’s popularity, but I insist that they had the right idea.