An Israeli spells out allegations against a dozen U.N. employees the country says participated in Hamas’ Oct. 7 assault.

The allegations against staffers with the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees prompted Western countries to freeze funds vital for the body, which is a lifeline for desperate Palestinians in Gaza. The U.N. fired nine of the 12 accused workers and condemned “the abhorrent alleged acts” of staff members.

The accusations come after years of tensions between Israel and the agency known as UNRWA over its work in Gaza, where it employs roughly 13,000 people.

Despite the humanitarian catastrophe unfolding in the besieged territory — where Israel’s war against Hamas has displaced the vast majority of the population and officials say a quarter of Palestinians are starving — major donors, including the U.S. and Britain, have cut funding. On Monday, Japan and Austria joined them in pausing assistance.

  • Zoolander@lemmy.worldEnglish
    388·
    10 months ago

    It’s crazy to me that these countries cut funding, even after they fired those people. UNRWA is providing much needed help, from what I’ve heard of the reporting so far, and this disrupts those efforts a lot.

    • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1416·
      10 months ago

      even after they fired those people

      An independent investigation is still ongoing as there are 190 accused, not just 9. Those 9 employees are only those against whom the evidence was compelling enough to prompt an immediate firing by the UNRWA.

        • DarkGamer@kbin.social
          918·
          10 months ago

          Evidently they count people as refugees even if they resettle elsewhere and get citizenship from another country, and all their descendants as well. If your father was a refugee so are you. Which leads to an interesting situation of people who were never personally displaced claiming refugee status for generations.

          • jonne@infosec.pubEnglish
            173·
            10 months ago

            So you think a people should just relinquish their claim on their homeland if they haven’t been personally displaced?

              • jonne@infosec.pubEnglish
                32·
                10 months ago

                I guess it depends, looks like you can go back 2000 years for Jews, but can’t even go less than 100 for Palestinians.

            • DarkGamer@kbin.social
              716·
              10 months ago

              I think they shouldn’t qualify as refugees if they haven’t been personally displaced, and I hope one day they realize that lives are more important than claims to land their ancestors lived on. The alternative, violence, is what led to them losing this land in the first place, and is why they continue to lose land and freedoms. Choosing violence has consequences.

              • jonne@infosec.pubEnglish
                105·
                10 months ago

                Definitely don’t let Israel know about your anti-Zionist views, you might lose your job.

                • DarkGamer@kbin.social
                  712·
                  10 months ago

                  Because anyone who disagrees with the pitchfork-wielding anti-Israel mob must be a shill, right? lol.

                  • jonne@infosec.pubEnglish
                    83·
                    10 months ago

                    Nah, I’m just saying that the whole point of Israel/Zionism is to let a people that was dispersed by the Roman Empire 2000 years ago should be allowed to return to their land. What you just said is that they should’ve just gotten over it and made a life whatever they ended up after one generation.

                    Or do the rules only apply to Palestinians, not Jews?