- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
The allegations against staffers with the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees prompted Western countries to freeze funds vital for the body, which is a lifeline for desperate Palestinians in Gaza. The U.N. fired nine of the 12 accused workers and condemned “the abhorrent alleged acts” of staff members.
The accusations come after years of tensions between Israel and the agency known as UNRWA over its work in Gaza, where it employs roughly 13,000 people.
Despite the humanitarian catastrophe unfolding in the besieged territory — where Israel’s war against Hamas has displaced the vast majority of the population and officials say a quarter of Palestinians are starving — major donors, including the U.S. and Britain, have cut funding. On Monday, Japan and Austria joined them in pausing assistance.
Definitely don’t let Israel know about your anti-Zionist views, you might lose your job.
Because anyone who disagrees with the pitchfork-wielding anti-Israel mob must be a shill, right? lol.
Removed by mod
Removed, rule 5. Attack the message, not the user.
“Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!”
Nah, I’m just saying that the whole point of Israel/Zionism is to let a people that was dispersed by the Roman Empire 2000 years ago should be allowed to return to their land. What you just said is that they should’ve just gotten over it and made a life whatever they ended up after one generation.
Or do the rules only apply to Palestinians, not Jews?
No, what I said was, “they shouldn’t qualify as refugees if they haven’t been personally displaced.” The rest of that is a poor attempt at putting words into my mouth. I never said anything about Jewish claims to the land based on the Roman Empire expelling them being valid.
You can’t get away with ad hominem, so you go right for the straw man fallacy. Is that what you consider to be, “engaging in good faith?”