Biden, as part of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, largely resolved these problems, reducing maximum premium payments (net of subsidies) and eliminating the cliff at 400 percent. The result is to make health insurance coverage substantially more affordable, especially for middle-income Americans who previously earned too much to be eligible for subsidies. Hence the surge in marketplace enrollments.

  • SnausagesinaBlanket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I am losing Medicaid starting March 1st because I make $131 a month too much SSDI and am fully disabled. There are 40 million more Americas just like me and there is no solution.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      There is a solution. Universal healthcare. There just isn’t the political will. I’m sorry you’re losing Medicaid. I hope you don’t have any chronic health conditions.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        There is a solution. Universal healthcare. There just isn’t the political will.

        Yeah, and we’ve been trying since Teddy Roosevelt. But hey, at least there’s the political will to support Netanyahu’s genocide. That’s way more important than whatever piddly nonsense poor sick people want.

    • june@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      The welfare cliff is, I think, one of the biggest drivers of poverty in the states. Without a system that provides a smooth transition there’s really no way that people can get out of poverty.

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Often, people who actually get jobs so that they don’t have to be dependent on Welfare end up making less money because of the cutoff salary.

        How is anyone supposed to get off welfare when the system is set up that way?

        • june@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yep. That’s the cliff. You make enough to not qualify but not enough to survive or even keep up with what you got before. It actively incentives people to not work

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sorry to hear that. The Republican-controlled house of congress is so dysfunctional that I can’t imagine their fixing it before you lose coverage.

  • aelwero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Biden deserves some political reward for this good news, given that Donald Trump and many in his party…

    Fucking election year, everybody fire up the spin. I hate politics :/

    This is wildly better than whatever shit the repub propaganda machine is gonna fart out though, so I reckon I’ll be avoiding Facebook and YouTube for a bit ;)

    • paultimate14@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is an article discussing things Biden’s administration have accomplished during his term.

      The GOP equivalent is shit like “the Democrats will take your guns” or “millions of brown people are threatening to invade the southern border”.

      Ideally, the constituency would pay attention to the things the government does all the time and remember that when it comes to elections. But no one fucking does, so the public needs articles to remind them. Even if only like 30% of eligible voters end up voting.

      This is exactly the kind of article that I would expect in the election year of a functioning democracy. The Republicans should be touting their own accomplishments too. Like Republican Chip Roy has been doing.

    • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Holding peoples livelihoods, their health, and rights hostage for votes and power is disgusting

      • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        True. Can’t imagine what horrors the republicans will get up to if they win.

        • Same sex marriage, gone.
        • Women voting, gone.
        • aborting your father’s rape-baby, gone.
        • interracial marriage, gone.
        • voting, gone
        • human slavery, believe it or not, IN.
        • quindraco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          10 months ago

          You left out child labor, unless you’re including that under slavery, which it’s functionally equivalent to.

        • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          10 months ago
          • You mean like what Biden and Co did with Respect for Marriage act? If SCOTUS strikes down Loving and Obergefell states can deny licenses to gay and interracial couples.
          • Dems did nothing for 50 years about RvW except raise money. Obama had more rot do with losing Roe than SCOTUS
          • Slavery still exists in this country, it just goes by a different name, same with Jim Crow.
          • Voting isn’t going anywhere

          Instead of demanding everyone support your senile pedo Zionist you should be demanding the DNC offer up someone else.

          • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I am asking that they offer someone else. But they don’t listen to me.

            • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              And they sure as fuck won’t listen if they get reelected. Re Electing them is a referendum of their prior actions.

        • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I mean, I’m very concerned that a second Trump term may result in a successful coup and… All that you said. But they’re not going to get a filibuster-proof majority, so even in the worst case, they won’t do all that. And no, they won’t end the filibuster to do it - for that, they would need a simple majority of MAGA Republicans in the Senate, and that’s not on the table either. The filibuster is antidemocratic and toxic, but it is a minor comfort at the moment. Of course, it would have never gotten this bad to begin with, without it.

          EDIT to add: I think my above message was confusing, as it sounds like I said I’m concerned they would do all those things, and in the next breath contradict that. What I meant to say is that, barring a coup, even if the Republicans capture the House of Reps, Senate, and Whitehouse, it’s unrealistic for them to be able to do all of that legislatively. A coup, though, is a very realistic possibility, and as PugJesus pointed out in a reply, the Supreme Court can and may do all of that as well - but that remains true even if the Democrats control the other branches. It’s a terrifying time. Vote, please.

          • PugJesus@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            They don’t need a filibuster proof majority. All they need is the Supreme Court.

            • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Well, yeah, although that path is really risky. But they also don’t need a second Trump term to do that. In fact, the court has clearly gone rogue even from the Republican party, and appears ready to keep throwing out the rule of law as long as they can get away with it, whether the party wants them to or not. Republican leadership absolutely didn’t expect their radicalized court would actually, for real, reverse Roe, and the party is paying for it. Now is certainly the time to hit them hard and take full advantage of that, until the Democrats have a filibuster-proof majority and can’t make any excuses.

      • neidu2@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’m all for democracy, but I think that this is sadly the end result - When governing becomes the goal, governance takes the back seat. Being president or prime minister is simply too lucrative.

      • aelwero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        They aren’t actually doing much… This is something they did a while ago, they’re just trotting it out and showing it off because there isn’t anything current going on.

    • SkepticalButOpenMinded
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Fucking election year, everybody fire up the spin. I hate politics :/

      I think I’m confused. How is this spin?

      Maybe we have different definitions of spin. To me, accurately discussing the political accomplishments of one politician over another is good in a functioning democracy.

  • LSNLDN@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Sorry not here to contribute just to say I read that as Bidencore and was worried there was a new grotesque genre that had emerged

      • Pratai
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Agreed and the same goes for “punk.” Putting punk after something immediately makes it cringy to me.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Biden deserves some political reward for this good news, given that Donald Trump and many in his party predicted economic and social disaster if he were elected, and that Republicans, in general, are still talking as if America were suffering from high inflation and runaway crime.

    Obamacare — which arguably should really be called Pelosicare, since Nancy Pelosi (who is not, whatever Trump may think, the same person as Nikki Haley) played a key role in getting it through Congress — led to big gains in health insurance coverage when it went into full effect in 2014.

    And this gain, unlike some of the other good things happening, is all on Biden, who both restored aid to people seeking health coverage and enhanced a key aspect of the system.

    But it wasn’t and isn’t, so what we have instead is a sort of Rube Goldberg device, a mix of gadgets designed to expand access to health care with minimal disruption of existing arrangements.

    Those marketplaces, in which insurers are forbidden to discriminate against people with pre-existing conditions and buyers receive subsidies to help them pay premiums, are a key part of the system.

    Biden, as part of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, largely resolved these problems, reducing maximum premium payments (net of subsidies) and eliminating the cliff at 400 percent.


    The original article contains 903 words, the summary contains 220 words. Saved 76%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Didn’t Romney himself say this would never work at the national level?

        Fuck Romney. He deserves no credit at all for something he specifically said he would never do for the nation if given the chance.

        • TH1NKTHRICE
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          obamacarefacts.com

          It’s my understanding that the individual mandate requires people to buy health insurance from private companies, this means those companies can thrive while offering terrible coverage for high costs without any chance of losing business because of their shady practices. This sounds to me like a plan that a conservative would concoct if they really wanted Laissez-faire / croney capitalism but wanted to placate the left by making it sound like this was entirely government funded.

          If this is true, it’s a win-win for the right. Keep it in place and the private medical companies are secure to maintain high profit margins surreptitiously. If it fails, blame the left and you get an easy justification for going back to having no government involvement at all whereby less people pay monthly because there is no individual mandate but the private medical companies are free to charge even more to the people who do pay and when those that don’t pay need medical treatment (everyone eventually in their lifetime) they can charge an arm and a leg and laugh all the way to the bank while medical debt for citizens skyrockets. The best part? If this plan is put in place carefully enough and messaging is carefully crafted, you’ll get nominally left people advocating for it!

          Am I wrong?