• megopie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    Eh, I mean they did mess around, but they were mainly just exacerbating existing issues and fault lines.

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s exactly how it works. Find the fault lines and apply pressure. If you do it right, it doesn’t even cost much.

      • megopie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Eh, it doesn’t move the needle very much though. It only really does anything when there’s already a very close situation. If the case were otherwise then there would probably be a lot less spending on campaigns

        • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          10 months ago

          I disagree. Flooding the internet with disinformation isn’t that expensive and although it’s probably impossible to measure, I think there’s tremendous potential to sway opinions.

          Russian troll farms and bot farms come to mind.

          To what you said, I don’t think there would be so much effort if it didn’t work.

          This is one example: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/fake-joe-biden-robocalltells-new-hampshire-democrats-not-vote-tuesday-rcna134984

          I haven’t researched this or anything, but this kind of thing feels like low-hanging fruit that moves needles.

          If you know of any interesting articles or studies about the topic, I’d definitely be interested in them! 🙂

        • NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Didn’t like 90+% of the online parts of the trucker convoy nonsense come from like 2 Facebook accounts? Small groups can get the ball rolling far more than you seem to think