• SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Shhhh. That is future poor peoples problem and capitalism doesn’t think about those people. Now, wouldn’t you love to pay hundreds of dollars a month for the privilege of being able to surf the internet ANYWHERE in the world at lightning fast speeds? Doesn’t that sound great? All the porn all the time. What could be better?

    • Revan343
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Well the starlink ones aren’t going to be space trash-- they eventually fall out of orbit and burn up. Hopefully these go with the same plan

      • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        The main issue ATM tho, from what I’ve heard, is what this huge amount of extra crap is doing to us studying space from the ground.

        • Revan343
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          There is that. The other issue which I ignored but is significant is the emissions from the rocket launches getting the satellites up there in the first place

          • Infinite@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Globally, rocket launches are something like 0.005% of the emissions of the airline industry.

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        You need to orbit them low enough to experience drag if you want reasonable latency.