Ten years, if they stick by the claim they made under oath about CoD. Other games? Don’t know. But not every ActBlizz game as long as CoD is still around. Theoretically, they could throw CoD under a new banner and spin it off into “not-ActivisionBlizzard”, but I don’t know what their plans are.

To be honest, while Activision’s recent games tend to get equal treatment on PC and console (I believe; I may be wrong), Blizzard is another story entirely. And Activision-developed games right now amount to CoD, Crash, and Tony Hawk.

Blizzard’s in a different situation. Games like WoW aren’t and likely won’t ever be on consoles (unless this deal gets it on Xbox somehow). Warcraft and StarCraft are pretty much PC-only with a couple of console ports early on. Hearthstone is PC and mobile. (Note: I’m counting Mac as PC purely out of convenience and I don’t really care that Apple doesn’t like the label.)

Overwatch is on consoles, but it has other issues. In my experience, it’s always felt like more dev attention is paid to the PC version, but I can’t really state that as fact. I don’t know if Diablo favors PC over consoles either when it comes to development focus. From what I understand, IV is working equally fine across systems, but I don’t play it or pay attention to it much.

King is just mobile, so I doubt there’ll be any change there. To be honest, Microsoft’s continual insistence on gaining a presence on mobile makes me think King may be more valuable to them in some respect compared to the other two.