I’m politically agnostic and have moved from a slightly conservative stance to a vastly more progressive stance (european). i still dont get the more niche things like tankies and anarchists at this point but I would like to, without spending 10 hours reading endless manifests (which do have merit, no doubt, but still).

Can someone explain to me why anarchy isnt the guy (or gal, or gang, or entity) with the bigger stick making the rules?

  • moormaan
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    While the US does have a lot of soft power in influencing nations, they certainly aren’t making the rules for other countries and puppeting them.

    This is a very rosy eyed statement. The “soft” power is the visible part, just the tip of the iceberg.