I’m politically agnostic and have moved from a slightly conservative stance to a vastly more progressive stance (european). i still dont get the more niche things like tankies and anarchists at this point but I would like to, without spending 10 hours reading endless manifests (which do have merit, no doubt, but still).

Can someone explain to me why anarchy isnt the guy (or gal, or gang, or entity) with the bigger stick making the rules?

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      No hierarchal form of government, but rather a coalition of every single person that lives in the society. Things are definitely still governed. It isn’t chaos.

        • GreyEyedGhost
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Anarchy is important when talking about government, as can be seen in a number of comments in this post.

          • CluckN@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If your math is full of zeros you have a good time if your government is full of anarchy you will have your bronze statue take down via rope.