• porkins@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not necessarily. It just requires excitation at a molecular level. You can get creative with your source. They have been playing around with low energy methods like LED or even just using the sun, geothermal, etc.

    • Showroom7561
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, I’m aware of different way to distill, but if this were to work in a home/commercial setting, it needs to be accessible/affordable.

      I’d personally love to get a home distiller, but I read they were very expensive to run :(

      • porkins@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was about to write back that we are not far off the advances to make these affordable and then did a google search and found that you can get a distilled unit on Amazon for $180 that is capable of making a gallon in 5 hours for about $.45 worth of electricity. That is far less than what it costs to buy distilled water at the store, which is around $1 a gallon. If you look at this from a break-even analysis, you technically start to reap the rewards of ownership after about 800 uses since the first 400 uses basically cost you $1.45 per gallon, then the next 400 costs you $.45 per gallon, but you are recouping that extra cost over the $1 retail price, so by the 800th use, you are getting water at less than half the price of the store.

        • Showroom7561
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A gallon is not much though, not for a family. If you have to double or triple that amount, the electricity costs will really add up. If you’re talking European electricity costs, you might as well drink expensive wine instead 😂

          If cost was more in line with traditional filters, then it may be a more accessible option. But electricity costs are only going up.

          • porkins@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Even with fission, nuclear is a panacea of energy with almost no waste for modern reactors. I can see there being an initial rise in energy costs to get those projects built out though. If they are phasing out nuclear, that would be dumb.

            Additionally, researchers at MIT recently found that you can evaporate water without heat, so that should hopefully be a thing in the near future.