With apologies for the colour scheme (I’m so sorry if you’re colour blind!). This is the lower layer of a two layer 1D inversion model, interpolated. Was playing with maximizing the contrast to try to find the foundation of the Richardson Mansion that existed on this property prior to it being bulldozed in the 70s and donated to the City of Winnipeg to become Munson Park. I’m pretty sure I captured it in the red square in the middle.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    6 months ago

    Oh I know on the price, I’ve spent plenty of time I. the field with a half million dollars in gps and hyperspectral equipment on my back. My background was originally in sonar but underwater, didn’t get into aerial and spaceborne remote sensing till my second career.

    Ideally I’d like to be able to measure soil moisture, soils density, CO2 and vocs at the same time. I’ve been looking into some of the recent advances in millimeter wave stuff, sonar, infrared, and also infernometrics using WiFi radio antenna. We’ve got a couple grant proposals in to fund some proof of concept stuff but nothing funded so far. Even if it was a fixed position imaging device, anything that could capture spatial variance over time would be a major improvement.

    Unfortunately science equipment is really not a big money maker, so very little private investment.

    It seems like the EM38 could be used to characterize a site over time with multiple passes. Looks since it’s based on electrical conductivity I would expect moisture content to drive variation.

    Honestly if we could just get soil depth that would be huge.

    • TroyOPMEnglish
      2·
      6 months ago

      If the soil is sandy, GPR is probably your golden ticket. But it only works in electrically resistive regimes.

      We’ve got a new toy coming in a few months – the EM31-8. In theory it’ll give us a real time four layer soil model to a depth of six metres as we walk. I haven’t had it in my hands, so can’t speak with confidence about the model it’ll produce (yet). Commercial unit #1. Living on the edge, expecting to bleed a little. :)

        • TroyOPMEnglish
          3·
          6 months ago

          I co-own a small business. Two people, no employees. We do geophysical equipment, in the general sense. Sales, rentals, service, training, customization, long term repair work for discontinued products, and some R&D when we have time. It’s super niche stuff, and we probably have less than a dozen competitors globally, all of whom are very small (like us).

          With have no official relationship with Geonics (the above equipment manufacturer) and do not formally represent them in any way. We are a customer.

          However, we have about a dozen of their instruments in our pool. This instrument is new, both to us, and as a product from the manufacturer.

          I’m donating time on the equipment later this month to a Planetary Society research project – but I’ve never used it before. When we’re supporting the equipment in our pool, I need to be able to provide tech support and such, and to do that, I need experience surveying with them. This was one such survey. No client, just me testing a new toy. I borrowed my SO and had her film my setup and teardown, and I’ll make a tutorial video out of that when I have time to splice footage. We spent our evening together in the park on New Year’s Day. Fortunately she is also a geophysicist and can tolerate that sort of date night ;)

          There isn’t much going on in c/geophysics so I’ve been sort of posting random work stuff. Like the above test data, which was a quick and dirty QGIS plot.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            6 months ago

            Well we’re not quite there yet, but I’d like to keep in contact with you regarding renting. My wife and I both have university association as well as private and non-proft relationships where we sit as PI or co-PI.

            If nothing else I’d love to get into a call with you can chat about the state of the industry/ technology. Like I said, our work is primarily biogeochemical in nature, but we’ve got an ongoing conversation in our house about how we’re fundamentally limited by the tool-kits and culture of the domain. Its roots are largely in agriculture/ forestry and we are primarily interested in massively scaling the number of samples we can take, reducing the time it takes to get samples, increasing the various resolutions of sampling, and non-destructive sampling. PM me directly and I’ll shoot you my contact information.