TheJims@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoMultiple state Republican parties are going brokewww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1331arrow-down112cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1319arrow-down1external-linkMultiple state Republican parties are going brokewww.newsweek.comTheJims@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square52fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareKraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up108arrow-down2·1 year agoGoing broke, or having all of their money embezzled by senior leadership?
minus-squareQuetzlcoatl@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up73arrow-down1·1 year agodeleted by creator
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30arrow-down3·1 year agoWhat else is the Republican Party good for at this point?
minus-square【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoConcentrating them, if you will.
minus-square【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoI don’t know why this phrase seems too long in Spanish. Isn’t there a shorter way to say it?
minus-squareLemminary@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIn this particular case, you have two of the few words in English that are two separate words in Spanish by mere coincidence. I guess you could say “¿Por qué no ambos?” which is a literal translation but it sounds less colloquial.
Going broke, or having all of their money embezzled by senior leadership?
deleted by creator
What else is the Republican Party good for at this point?
Taking away women’s rights.
Relocating migrants
Concentrating them, if you will.
por que no los dos?
I don’t know why this phrase seems too long in Spanish. Isn’t there a shorter way to say it?
In this particular case, you have two of the few words in English that are two separate words in Spanish by mere coincidence. I guess you could say “¿Por qué no ambos?” which is a literal translation but it sounds less colloquial.